Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-10 submitted

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 21 February 2007 15:02 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJsyt-0003KV-Hs for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:02:07 -0500
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJsys-0003Ke-65 for ietf-dkim-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:02:07 -0500
Received: from sb7.songbird.com (sb7.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1LExsYK007607; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:59:55 -0800
Received: from imx2.tcd.ie (imx2.tcd.ie [134.226.1.156]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1LExm64007590 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:59:49 -0800
Received: from Vams.imx2 (imx2.tcd.ie [134.226.1.156]) by imx2.tcd.ie (Postfix) with SMTP id A28B568057; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:59:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from imx2.tcd.ie ([134.226.1.156]) by imx2.tcd.ie ([134.226.1.156]) with SMTP (gateway) id A03D8F9F303; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:59:42 +0000
Received: from [134.226.62.103] (cswireless62-103.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.62.103]) by imx2.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A57068057; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:59:42 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <45DC5EAD.9080506@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:01:01 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <leiba@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-10 submitted
References: <FDCFEC302CB80E935E6E2AA6@irma.neophilic.com> <45DC5B55.7030005@watson.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <45DC5B55.7030005@watson.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus-Status: MessageID = A13D8F9F303
X-AntiVirus-Status: Host: imx2.tcd.ie
X-AntiVirus-Status: Action Taken:
X-AntiVirus-Status: NONE
X-AntiVirus-Status: Checked by TCD Vexira. (version=1.57.6 VDF=9.62.6)
X-Songbird: Clean, Clean
Cc: IETF DKIM WG <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird-From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126


Barry Leiba wrote:
>> The DKIM base draft has been updated and submitted.  The changes are 
>> minimal, comprising response to IESG review and some XML updates 
>> intended to smooth the rfc-editor review.
> 
> And the -base-10 draft is now on its way to the RFC editor queue,[1] 
> having passed IESG review.  Many thanks to everyone who worked to get 
> this done.  And now we just wait for the RFC editor process, and the RFC 
> number for the Proposed Standard.

And get active on SSP again. (Or should I cancel the Prague meeting
slot? So far we've little to discuss it seems.)

S.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html