IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM key rotation best practice

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 07 August 2020 02:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6544C3A0CFA for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bGFh4Z_lyWoz for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A1673A0BF2 for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.67] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 0772QIcM011801 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:26:18 -0700
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: Shana Bagherian <Shana.Bagherian@tridengroup.com>
References: <BYAPR15MB25670F15F55200ED4145124AEC480@BYAPR15MB2567.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Cc: "'ietf-dkim@ietf.org'" <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <59c0fd6f-1406-9981-a78f-1c08d774c76a@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 19:23:31 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR15MB25670F15F55200ED4145124AEC480@BYAPR15MB2567.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/toQPKCQwYPjlexHgDQ6rw1nDu5k>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM key rotation best practice
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM List <ietf-dkim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 02:23:40 -0000

On 8/6/2020 3:42 PM, Shana Bagherian wrote:
> So, I was wondering if any of the RCSs related to DKIM list a best 
> practice, or if some other authority has given a best practice, 
> regarding how often the keys should be changed?


M3AAWG DKIM Key Rotation Best Common Practices
(revised March 2019)

https://www.m3aawg.org/DKIMKeyRotation


d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email