IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-languages] simple variant

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Fri, 19 April 2019 06:06 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2133D12007C for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Qe3Z2EPDIbf for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C033120047 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id DA7BF7C0590; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:06:47 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CE37C053B for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:06:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Authentication-Results: mork.alvestrand.no (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6_T0xTfItu5r for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:06:44 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:06:18 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=2620:0:2830:201::1:72; helo=pechora6.dc.icann.org; envelope-from=cowan@ccil.org; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora6.dc.icann.org (pechora6.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2830:201::1:72]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A81D27C0398 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:06:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora6.dc.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409DE1E067E for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 06:00:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id k17so5675594wrx.10 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NoXfl3vIiW2MPSCrvvdJMvsOJT8d8FiL5ayZxugRbJA=; b=1+ZvFwraOHxDM8qL33TiRXakmaLCvtiujGyvxNhTWORWySLTltBTUPZRap/JWByLds RL7nyjKiuwVgcgCBZURtbVUHte9DluMiL2VaSB6JurdP7GV3ptgWZ5TSgAZ+VmFhxIx2 +lpB0tNYo7fc+BBa74SILa6gJ5Ww7wxHhWFmyRbH22jG7kyP987t+URhDXxwenkxouD/ M9MBj0HKat3Q6N6NwCD9KzrQyV/xKDhtbCdB8TMuoS7q8wY8g4jrUGa6jRt770FUPLZQ 5nnGDYyqdHfI1IFlksSmV0SGXgMVZ5DLAEsBBCSIB+uBeY4Vz3eHw+6mxDmze0hlFwa+ 7+kA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NoXfl3vIiW2MPSCrvvdJMvsOJT8d8FiL5ayZxugRbJA=; b=FJ/XbBj66f7HVUk+dLsYcoeDMD7c5ozidxgwLcRt0QAt+Q6zlg/cQC/7TzSSZBJm48 GFMsZkKtmHUxhlJLuYyRAHe6oByj8MkSrK0WctsT+zFNnLqztisx27BlF9Eyzn1RM2FE rxKPDMPVY8aaX13cddKxNrhn1vj+6OD/fm/0WlAdR7xxhYem2dEwSht7Pfs7hZZFHg7P Q0rgEUzmtZxBt+ZVaxfdzWLP+orOrNhNGVmHvrKlLgw25fgsttfGsx+ShDTmrKU70H4Q vFqCU4Gg24Eo2EjysX6saPNO5S+oCyE60GhxrVGC5WgB4LIcPdlVDarsX4tE5xn9LdBZ 6GhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU5vvyA46qrwTRPLZYhkXY/a4qXepacE5HLeG170T/+ltMlmk+4 wf3WpaILCkJnqQ3GGWzspbFQO5CmaCjHnIBfulygJg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwpFPzlF2hA/Uhrxh6R1x7YaK3K4LWkoYXqnNx9u9CuMlvvQBDRs+pCYReyuyCfDFb+iX2QspdFJ/jkM8WhkOk=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:66cc:: with SMTP id k12mr1444697wrw.324.1555653601646; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190419121232.77c3c92a@sil-mh8>
In-Reply-To: <20190419121232.77c3c92a@sil-mh8>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 01:59:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2gp_Ry4XZa+tVszM3rYwS6bYCvuc1d8=hO-KEeAVP3jFLFUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Hosken <martin_hosken@sil.org>
Cc: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000051f06d0586dbd43f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/9Wh7zynNOo2RWH5Uv2yLLTiLpGc>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] simple variant
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 06:06:52 -0000

The canonical place to find the answers to questions like this is
https://www.iana.org/assignments/lang-subtags-templates/simple.txt.

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 1:21 AM Martin Hosken <martin_hosken@sil.org> wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I notice that the IANA registry has the following record:
>
> Type: variant
> Subtag: simple
> Description: Simplified form
> Added: 2015-12-29
>
> So, in theory, the simple variant may occur on any tag. Is this the
> intention? I realise that if there is a long list of tags that it can occur
> on, it may not be worth listing them all. But I'm wondering what the
> thinking is behind this variant. Perhaps just pointing me to the original
> application form may be enough.
>
> TIA,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email