Re: [Ietf-languages] Forms for subtag kmpre20c

Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> Tue, 26 November 2019 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <everson@evertype.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C819E120925 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:09:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=evertype.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m7w3NcjRxdSR for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:09:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2755B120900 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:09:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id D66737C3754; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:09:46 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDD17C37D1 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:09:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Authentication-Results: mork.alvestrand.no (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=evertype.com
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydXchjhb7VrO for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:09:43 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:06:34 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=2620:0:2d0:201::1:71; helo=pechora1.lax.icann.org; envelope-from=everson@evertype.com; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora1.lax.icann.org (pechora1.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:71]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 929CF7C3754 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:09:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk (scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk [77.72.0.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora1.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C411B1E05F2 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:03:05 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=evertype.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Ubf/CPDY3q5Qk6n7ayyQsOM1bpOVRPrhiffNhBYY578=; b=F2xQlbzpjomLHe5XrfDyb8qAL HHWPEa9yjsdeUr2yNQ+0clSpUGz0OSJEZaSfizjx91q/IKaeIs82gNxE6gly0mB7eIcYw/0bSbU6Q hpRj5KALlsz4FxcPCtuUARyTS5;
Received: from cpc139632-dund15-2-0-cust239.16-4.cable.virginm.net ([92.237.223.240]:52320 helo=[192.168.0.18]) by scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <everson@evertype.com>) id 1iZeEe-00085L-3o; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:02:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>
In-Reply-To: <000501d5a31c$cb6f52e0$624df8a0$@ewellic.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:02:43 +0000
Cc: Élie Roux <elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <167FFE0C-6159-42A9-A619-849F4EA4DBC9@evertype.com>
References: <20191121141336.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.9a3859061b.wbe@email03.godaddy.com> <CANfi1JjyouJV-CLXdKOwvRxcFPM0csTe8=+44hszSBhVTxd-qA@mail.gmail.com> <CANfi1JjeSo2-Ez52Nu3Lcb3jC9skPp2_YWza8Xnusu0Xi8vHuA@mail.gmail.com> <CANfi1JgVZ=rc1s=ELHoS=tv9HkwuzNCP0PUAZbjXWfWX0UtEXQ@mail.gmail.com> <000501d5a31c$cb6f52e0$624df8a0$@ewellic.org>
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - iana.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - evertype.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk: authenticated_id: everson@evertype.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: scandium.cloudhosting.co.uk: everson@evertype.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/ZA9Rk247VYPyYAGRqqvR9jf88UE>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Forms for subtag kmpre20c
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:09:52 -0000

I am still not happy with it. How many centuries of orthography is this tag supposed to support? What process will be able to do anything with it? And again, what are the reforms? What are their dates? The first of January 1901? Our tags generally point TO a reference, and don’t specify themselves by relation to what they are NOT. 

What sort of Khmer? Modern Khmer (whenever that dates from and to)? Or is this tag supposed to include Old and Middle Khmer? As to the reform or reforms, should there be a subtag that points to an authoritative source for one or more of these?

This is underspecified and it’s not satisfactory so far.

Michael

> On  24 Nov 2019, at 23:13, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:
> 
> Élie Roux wrote:
> 
>> Here's a re-submission addressing the comments (I hope).
> 
> I take this to be a new proposal, with a new review period ending Saturday, December 7, replacing the previous proposal which was tacitly rejected.
> 
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages