Re: [Ietf-languages] Northern Thai Variants

Mark Davis ☕️ <mark@macchiato.com> Thu, 10 January 2019 11:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.edward.davis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95D6130E0E for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 03:07:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.074
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.074 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.981, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=macchiato-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id THtpqFb1M2hf for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 03:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159BE1271FF for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 03:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id c206so8978954oib.0 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 03:07:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=macchiato-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YsIB5LTOPgtFFJFf5loYVvAgU/M4RG2Sg4kNILJEoME=; b=ziFSuVPmJDvsbaALkEC+ntDg9QRUofBgFbNl/T6DNnU3x9wAIiK2UtF1A3hqsVrxsA ZhxK20WSjCAAA6SmA7/04Y1u2E6iExio/31kbyuEtF4kpOQOJ/spIvGf1+X9Jdo18Spw PgUJqY+OylIdawT0a2lEBolJMYYzwvwKadZQkuF/5RooRZU2l74Iju/b/xrwLl9peSoD YvNzKqb/fCr/Qz+i37tiS61Xz0ohSc1EpJG+B4ntBilrp5Q4a1MThGX3x2oAyrpf93Zi 7F5z9wDJzUk0iZGQ5TQfvuHbOci+AIadkJoZjWRkd7l/8euw172dSGBeCnPMAczNK+CH h4sg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YsIB5LTOPgtFFJFf5loYVvAgU/M4RG2Sg4kNILJEoME=; b=hxH1eFm/btdD9P0a5EN75EitseggSPD0PW2r+OuFNeyhR1bdxNJan+emxYbf1UlT4F xqVCdmCJ//uoeuDyEubOfyYlf5k38YJUihsqqj2+K5g5SjNcJ6o+GwT4jDjHzqlpVWQo w+mtdvlRms1cyzo15zSc3xRlcEVaPnE7yh85jbdLnPlic8DfmVthDfdbOFm7uDh/oyB0 YOa+7wWrWF9diHzyrdCDaP6hYIC9c9RDKe7PWgsc1cT8aPX8PxD596RWUITOlK9iPArQ Sqm4Kw86ylB3Yf6w2sNpGPzcWWzSRrPD9mQOaveVLKmu4IecrZ61zv0WLutcILWFFesk Dm8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeu9tpPCF/sAeJ5cW1Gxy8HoVfyf6emwmqyhlLMin3w7tNlxD7N /ZO/rRdW5UIBuBw29ml54n6au46Q/XNgxSH0WU2ATLF32NI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7zfpg7vTEM5sse6rlzyuETI6ix/SnzxGRDO5MIZluAAPxWJp6DjoAZohuYJmCPFPCAwkrpPIpvTlUHh1FvbZo=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:e386:: with SMTP id a128mr5912383oih.79.1547118459028; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 03:07:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190110090859.23aec72a@JRWUBU2>
In-Reply-To: <20190110090859.23aec72a@JRWUBU2>
From: Mark Davis ☕️ <mark@macchiato.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:07:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ2xs_EO4PD=fK0KTJumwATmDg020nizGXfeyNy56_ft0nZvhw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham=40ntlworld.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: ietf-languages@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002d087e057f1896f3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/c3QtEu-wXSY5nhF6ziil_S2MQvM>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Northern Thai Variants
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 11:07:42 -0000

A few mechanics:
1. nod-Lana-etymo : The prefix values are only a recommendation, so there
is nothing preventing any variant with any prefix. You can have
fr-basiceng for example. In practice that is no problem, just as ja-Thai-AQ
is not a problem.
2. nod-Lana-t-Thai : would be nod-Thai-t-nod-Lana (or nod-Thai-t-und-Lana),
meaning nod in the Thai script that has been transformed from Lana.

Mark


On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:09 AM Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham=
40ntlworld.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> I have been looking at localisation for northern Thai (language code
> nod) and it seems to me that, simplifying, for any speech variety there
> are three basic varieties of writing system:
>
> 1) Writing in the Tai Tham script (subtag Lana)
> 2) Writing in the Thai script (subtag Thai) with consonants having
> the same phonetic values as the corresponding Tai Tham consonants.
> 3) Writing in the Thai script with stop consonants having
> the same phonetic values as in Standard Thai.
>
> My idea for approaching this is to use the labels:
>
> nod-Lana
> nod-Thai-etymo
> nod-Thai-phonetic
>
> However, there are several issues with this approach.
>
> The first is whether nod-etymo and and nod-phonetic would then be
> allowed as identifiers of Northern Thai Thai-script writing systems.
> nod-Lana-etymo would not make sense, and I'm not sure how to word the
> subtag record to exclude, or at least discourage, it.
>
> The second is the possibility that Scheme 2, but not Scheme 3, should
> be treated as a transform of Scheme 1, and therefore scheme 2 should
> be nod-Lana-t-Thai, which would remove the need for variants at this
> level.  My most cogent objection is that the transformation depends on
> phonetic and etymological information - ambiguities in some
> orthographies for Scheme 1 are removed in Scheme 2, and word-final
> <SIGN OA BELOW, RA> is converted according to etymology, (generally)
> with <O ANG, RO RUEA> in words of Pali/Sanskrit origin and <O ANG, NO
> NU> in native words.
>
> Users of Northern Thai learn Standard Thai in school, and will
> generally be more fluent in writing Standard Thai than in writing
> Northen Thai.
>
> Can I please have advice.
>
> Richard.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>