IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Registration request for EntityId, Isolation, OData-MaxVersion, and OData-Version

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sat, 01 September 2018 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12875124D68 for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 01:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fxCFFSxEJ-UV for <ietf-message-headers@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 01:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD9312426A for <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 01:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1535791622; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=fq8KxtQ7p7sYHmTtCgQxptOozQjiVydPOpLMR/MfnSQ=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=ftNGZT6HkuP/tXaN5za+lKs+AOSFwaJEPVR7/ryRlBmwDuHB/ke1BisBFRC+qj6FmE/nf7 09bB+VXGAb5LFedouhMHJcb0sOtH8UlNxaSzp/gylWJZAC9kgO/1rlsL/OpakJN10nhlvY SAMqTN+vclqwai1BYxOUrPB1A2Zu+L8=;
Received: from [192.168.0.7] (cpc121086-nmal24-2-0-cust54.19-2.cable.virginm.net [77.97.145.55]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <W4pSBAAFZKi2@waldorf.isode.com>; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 09:47:02 +0100
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-message-headers@ietf.org" <ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>
References: <CAAwgnnOSdnKMDBZFq2BzazP6eKsPpAeuEmN6qstTCFQ8nQ=1+A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMC7itwTqKEfKn=U_aM2TKTkwN+Bzp6E1aj47gp9S66YrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAwgnnPh9dKaadxMiOzm=ZV2N_i5WrhD3unVBJ8jVSriLNq8MA@mail.gmail.com> <BN7PR05MB42420B1185F9CC9508B50432840F0@BN7PR05MB4242.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMAyiJvNDprx5AhjFTW9BkHy5D0vjhgVjuJzQwSC+kyujg@mail.gmail.com> <7C3260F5-FE8D-43A7-8866-2299D60AE5C6@mnot.net>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <34460ab2-038b-5991-9ada-b689166afdcd@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 09:47:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
In-Reply-To: <7C3260F5-FE8D-43A7-8866-2299D60AE5C6@mnot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-message-headers/Z3BBoI5Ok2wE86AgocbGR96lygM>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-message-headers] Registration request for EntityId, Isolation, OData-MaxVersion, and OData-Version
X-BeenThere: ietf-message-headers@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for header fields used in Internet messaging applications." <ietf-message-headers.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-message-headers>, <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-message-headers/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-message-headers@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers>, <mailto:ietf-message-headers-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 08:47:06 -0000

On 01/09/2018 00:48, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 1 Sep 2018, at 2:54 am, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This change was made based on feedback for users and implementors of the OData standard.  I gather your preference would be that we use the OData-prefixed version for the registrations.  If so I will need to discuss that with the TC and get back to you.
>>
>>
>> While that would be my personal preference, it is simply that:  my opinion as an individual.  I'm primarily concerned that other, unregistered or pre-registration uses of these more general concepts may occur.  While recording them in the registry will help avoid collisions, there is always some risk and the more general the term, the higher the risk.
>>
> 
> Speaking personally, I'd second that concern. It's least confusing when headers that are specific to an application (in this case, OData) include that application's name in their field name.

Speaking personally as well, I second the concern.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email