[ietf-nomcom] Selection of NomCom volunteers

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 02 August 2012 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B28221E8113 for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f2dpKeQY97DM for <ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DCA21E8114 for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sm-THINK.elandsys.com ([41.136.236.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q72IjuID002632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1343933168; bh=2tKL1utv7ngtbBVLCDT3GVvsWv6OUHbtHcZgEB2lEsU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=K2S+fzVX38dvlzYxa2U7X3lvSmM8q//j22236rcag4EI0p+XJ7SEVCVWSF1JqMlcu V7wgYrtE1LJxvM01fLQriZOCuvcTLoWR/Xjf0XYPK1YtCu9dllbrpDEtGBu97SeZZD zrApfzCcqIpAzprTweEZIduxDrf7ocBctMml++P8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1343933168; i=@elandsys.com; bh=2tKL1utv7ngtbBVLCDT3GVvsWv6OUHbtHcZgEB2lEsU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=usPBfHtSJvTkbNieg8jPn39bf3kyO1lCoZb3pSRzdH+zIILZqj5AH3xiKeqxJsdbd 4d8f0y41NeIg70or8oOdMzX8kcwLuR/LzP3uWTlKTQJWsMd0pU7y3n8eXkcRz/uXZ+ PQuWI/hLHd0OCql/2o1+eyCdtw1OypInlfWWyFXo=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120802104620.04cc9828@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:45:11 -0700
To: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:30:21 -0700
Subject: [ietf-nomcom] Selection of NomCom volunteers
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-nomcom>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:46:17 -0000

Hello,

draft-moonesamy-nomcom-selection-00 ( 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-nomcom-selection-00 ) is a 
proposal to update RFC 3777 to increase the number of volunteers who 
are eligible to serve on NomCom and to increase the selection of 
volunteers having different primary affiliations.  In a nutshell the 
rules for eligibility suggested are:

   (a) Not a sitting member of the IAB, IESG or IAOC

   (b) Must have attended at least 4 out of the last 10 IETF meetings

   (c) Each NomCom member has a different affiliation

Item (b) should broaden the pool of eligible volunteers.  It also 
takes into account the 1-1-1 plan for venue selection.

21% of authors for recent RFCs are from five companies.  60% of 
NomCom 2011-2012 members were from three of these five 
companies.  Item (c) is to ensure wider representativity and to allow 
more sponsors to participate in the selection of IAB, IESG and IAOC members.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy