IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ietf-nomcom] Report on the RFC 8989 experiment

IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> Wed, 01 September 2021 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <chair@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-nomcom@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA75E3A11F9; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1iXIdl68H7wy; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:5c97:7e70:6bb5:8d98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59A393A11F7; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 21:01:58 +0300
Message-Id: <C5D2F5EC-6483-441C-90BC-1900E305D226@ietf.org>
Cc: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org, ietf-nomcom@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-nomcom/svE36YUuavmukSnBQwg7GoEzVpI>
Subject: [ietf-nomcom] Report on the RFC 8989 experiment
X-BeenThere: ietf-nomcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of possible revisions to the NomCom process <ietf-nomcom.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-nomcom/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nomcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nomcom>, <mailto:ietf-nomcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 18:02:08 -0000

Hi,

the experiment in RFC 8989 ("Additional Criteria for Nominating Committee Eligibility") tasks the IESG to publish a report on the results of the experiments.

According to the timeline on https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2021/, we're publishing this report today in consultation with the 2020-21 NomCom Chair, Barbara Stark, and the 2021-22 NomCom Chair, Gabriel Montenegro. Please find the report at https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/report-on-rfc8989-experiment/

I'd like to highlight one item from the report, which is the IESG's suggestion to the community to extend the RFC 8989 experiment for the upcoming 2022-23 NomCom cycle, i.e., to go with option (3) in RFC 8989 Section 2. (Please refer to the report for a rationale.)

Please direct questions or comments about this report or the suggested option (3) to eligibility-discuss@ietf.org.

Lars Eggert
IETF Chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email