Re: [ietf-privacy] [perpass] Wiki for managing PPM reviews of existing RFCs

(bcc'ing perpass and moving this to ietf-privacy which
we agreed was a better list for this)

On 03/24/2014 03:46 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 3/23/14 6:49 PM, Jiankang Yao wrote:
>> it is a good start. thanks.
>> since there are thousands of RFCs, it is better that they can be
>> reviewd by category.
>> for example, based on the following category:
>> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/np.html
> 
> I'm not sure about that - there are a lot of documents
> defining protocols that have never been implemented or
> deployed, and so on.  It seems likely to me that as this
> process is starting up, people will tend to review
> significant documents, which is what probably the best
> place to start anyway.  As more documents are reviewed
> there may be a need to become more systematic.  But
> for now, I think the current situation is good.

I agree with Melinda. Let's get a body of work done
that people want to do or feel is important to do
and then we can organise that.

So jump in and review something.

S.

> 
> Melinda
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> perpass mailing list
> perpass@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
> 