IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-sailors] another year, another three meetings

Al Morton <acmorton@att.com> Wed, 13 January 2010 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-sailors@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-sailors@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3FC3A67F6 for <ietf-sailors@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:52:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.067
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.067 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.729, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyBNj7GQ6SHq for <ietf-sailors@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail161.messagelabs.com (mail161.messagelabs.com [216.82.253.115]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BE73A6855 for <ietf-sailors@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:52:22 -0800 (PST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: acmorton@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-161.messagelabs.com!1263405138!17035506!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 4461 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 17:52:19 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-2.tower-161.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 17:52:19 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0DHqHR2003200 for <ietf-sailors@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:52:17 -0600
Received: from klpd017.kcdc.att.com (klpd017.kcdc.att.com [135.188.40.86]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0DHqCDK003001 for <ietf-sailors@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:52:12 -0600
Received: from kcdc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by klpd017.kcdc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0DHqCwY004828 for <ietf-sailors@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:52:12 -0600
Received: from maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by klpd017.kcdc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0DHq6Go004758 for <ietf-sailors@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:52:07 -0600
Message-Id: <201001131752.o0DHq6Go004758@klpd017.kcdc.att.com>
Received: from acmt.att.com (dyp004254dys.mt.att.com[135.16.251.229](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20100113175206gw100m6b2he>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:52:06 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.16.251.229]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:49:44 -0500
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
From: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <40B0BE5E-9267-4654-A292-81963133E89A@gmail.com>
References: <425234B3-C6CC-47B8-B5CE-8E1BCB4E307B@nokia.com> <40B0BE5E-9267-4654-A292-81963133E89A@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf-sailors@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-sailors] another year, another three meetings
X-BeenThere: ietf-sailors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list to plan sailing events collocated with IETF meetings." <ietf-sailors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-sailors>, <mailto:ietf-sailors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-sailors>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-sailors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-sailors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-sailors>, <mailto:ietf-sailors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:52:23 -0000

At 12:47 PM 1/13/2010, Bob Hinden wrote:
> > Finally, I have no clue if Beijing offers any sailing possibilities.
>
>They have boats like this available:
>
>   http://www.beijing-visitor.com/index.php?cID=417&pID=1323
Nice find! it seems that buoyancy is optional in this definition
of boat, and any means of making way...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email