IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt

"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Wed, 12 August 2009 20:18 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7CKILgt033446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:18:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n7CKILDS033444; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:18:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7CKIFV7033433 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:18:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org)
Received: from rpco-jdmacbook.rpcorp.local (np34.co.returnpath.net [38.109.196.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n7CKIBeQ012612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:18:14 -0600
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 ocelope.disgruntled.net n7CKIBeQ012612
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cybernothing.org; s=satori; t=1250108294; bh=FLyAWw2+IE+gCcBsMQfKcIzpT/s2vhE7v27lPBBw s5w=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cps0CzAnADPE XnYU+rEwquniNgDTLizoQh7d34I0vEpLFlA8lbaH5LQLEMvwwYnhjfzq+g1+8FWO5pV Uj17lvxAfUVpqtL8Re8Sus+Z+DQB7Fp4XpsVqYz6Se/awfQG/U+y0X/pKXXy+uERFiP Qpjh7OQWKgXFBnbD/Fau4BEpw=
Message-ID: <4A83237E.2090904@cybernothing.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:18:06 -0600
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 1.0b14 (Macintosh/2009072715)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-smtp@imc.org
Subject: Re: Requesting comments on draft-cheney-safe-02.txt
References: <f6fecbd18af7.4a721c99@us.army.mil> <4A720D35.1000306@cybernothing.org> <f6e091e580a6.4a7258af@us.army.mil> <20090807100147.GA16131@gsp.org> <f73e99651b6bb.4a7d3869@us.army.mil> <4A7D9E48.4010201@santronics.com> <f77ca8111ab99.4a7e1f62@us.army.mil> <4A7E37DE.7080106@santronics.com> <fc7aaeea24a1c.4a828fc1@us.army.mil>
In-Reply-To: <fc7aaeea24a1c.4a828fc1@us.army.mil>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC wrote:

> Just out of curiousity how much is event oriented execution worth to
> you?

The economics of this suggested solution aren't at issue.

I don't think anyone is saying that the security issues you've mentioned are 
not issues, or that your idea wouldn't work if the internet adopted it 
overnight.  What they're saying (and I agree) is that the solution you've 
come up with is unlikely to gain much attention -- or implementation.

-- 
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email