IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] Email standard revision

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 18 February 2020 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FCA120830 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:47:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L-wM_b5EWfnq for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 701F5120811 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C4667E; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:47:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:47:40 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=pYj0YUCu+Dg3PJmr+QrfNg03HqcdN ASV2+6pJTW3wUU=; b=4Yt9KeFQby3h4fBN6iqaHOWjL1S2uXNLNnvUK0pefkeZP m3FI47j8sC/Shm+VJVP+j0lr0ZLCQzooxEcZFJXt2fdVby6VtCE0vXntnzrUoLxA iaMYXCSGgYNNwI1HO5tx+QkzwCWZ1R9HHscwqZMr051e4LbzaMkPHLR+A5V7SFQx 7GJBtKbX8aWpQ6qlLVmEgb03Exb4DxK/5V9reuPY1ycJx1Ewzq5UIM12SGTEICuu pZw/0nSjolJMn5BcFCZEOjIO+CvNDYPBlvhIcDxz+ExId6Q86vrbcy+N6xjGboPC MtTqvOYhaT9WSn3oGA9WS04Z0i7X1X27gRQfbQebw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:i2lMXmPUBnGT-pDIagPpGCrQUZqRN3ErfdsiVi9sc6DoTI61eLh4Cg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrjeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrh hofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghi lhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfrhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthejredttd efjeenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucevrhhotghkvghruceoughhtgesuggtrhhotghkvghr rdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepsggsihifrdhnvghtnecukfhppeehtddrvddviedrje drvdduleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm peguhhgtsegutghrohgtkhgvrhdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:i2lMXpP897W1AeGPMdBYt_qX1RVjLS6RCIf2JlXHjid7_2juscWtkQ> <xmx:i2lMXg2QV5vooa9yJLebj3JyicHraxnzDW5IPduj2hmwN39E3BVQVQ> <xmx:i2lMXl0U3Dly8yxAFFFY9mdBf1FoZfG3c8JG_WvkioRN1Tu5g7XDBA> <xmx:i2lMXmKqolRekyZzlvqvPDX0_T8PbjevN1DVxaLyvYTACT_sRS9VHw>
Received: from [172.16.22.72] (unknown [50.226.7.219]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0D80E328005A; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:47:38 -0500 (EST)
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
References: <CAOEezJTLEzpDUivS50xUvQtQbNNyJXVKk29Q=c4QRaxgRvTxBw@mail.gmail.com> <972BC556117E20BE16D62E29@PSB> <7c7bd9e2-ffc8-c307-898a-2c827c72695f@tana.it> <eb8a1c75-294b-6deb-3bb2-68ac723543d5@dcrocker.net> <A154AA91085706BE2792213F@PSB> <1fc6097c-18be-6249-8dc1-528eb0d786a6@dcrocker.net> <57E9B77701DCFE0B4E62B6FC@PSB>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <4c5e1f6d-058d-2844-1b86-c08ba5d4e68b@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:47:40 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57E9B77701DCFE0B4E62B6FC@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/JeqVpJxO0zrZrDnLFVaP0Uc4g2o>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Email standard revision
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:47:43 -0000

On 2/18/2020 2:42 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> 
> --On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 14:34 -0800 Dave Crocker
> <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> 
>> ...
>> On 2/18/2020 11:12 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>>> The difficulty I see
>>> is that the language in RFC 2026 seems very clear to me: "no
>>> known technical omissions with respect to the requirements
>>> placed upon it" without an explicit IESG waiver for Proposed
>>> Standards;
>>
>> Since the goal for the effort described in the text I offered
>> is for full standard and not proposed, I have no idea what
>> your reference, here, pertains to.
> 
> Please read the rest of that sentence, which read...
> 
>>   not even an exception procedure for Internet
>> Standard.


I'll guess you mean that the criteria for Proposed extend to Full, but 
that's just a guess.

At that, I still have no idea how it is applicable here.  My guess is 
that you have some unstated assumptions or analyses or conclusions that 
establish the relevance, but I don't know what it/they are.


d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email