Re: rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report

[John C Klensin <[e-mail]>]

--On Friday, 11 July, 2008 10:27 -0400 Tony Hansen
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> Thanks John! I'll buy you a <your-choice-of-beverage> in
> Dublin!

Enthusiastically accepted -- I need it at this stage and hope
others can join us.

>...
One additional comment...

>> * Three changes have been made (again, relative to -10) in
>> addition to the ones in the list in Tony's note of a few days
>> ago.  I have added an explicit note asking the RFC Editor to
>> remove the Change Log (Appendix G) before publication.  That
>> was always the intent but the note wasn't inserted due to a
>> technical glitch.   I have also added an informative reference
>> to RFC 5248 (BCP 138) (the Enhanced Mail System Status Code
>> registry spec).  Again, that was always the intention since
>> this work motivated that specification.

I should have explicitly thanked Frank for catching both of
those glitches.   While I've occasionally been irritated and/or
frustrated by his many detailed and nit-picking messages and
have disagreed with many of them, I appreciate his careful and
critical reading of each draft -- this document would be of
significantly lower quality without those efforts.

    john