IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Mon, 17 October 2011 19:20 UTC

Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9HJKPw2088980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:20:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id p9HJKP7v088979; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:20:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9HJKOoW088962 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:20:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from msk@cloudmark.com)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:20:20 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "ietf-smtp@imc.org" <ietf-smtp@imc.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:20:19 -0700
Subject: RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING
Thread-Topic: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING
Thread-Index: AcyM93kID5fRxQE2SjWlzf7x9qeNRAAANVKAAAJIYfA=
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14A80@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4E942BE2.7040007@gmail.com> <4E9C56EE.5030108@gmail.com> <2B8DE601-7C81-473F-B5FB-4F0D8CD075FC@network-heretics.com> <4E9C5E13.6040908@gmail.com> <214C101B-22D3-45F7-8665-EA1A9C8EF3F9@network-heretics.com> <4E9C65F4.2000902@gmail.com> <4E9C6866.2010208@gmail.com> <CCAD1B31-C392-49AF-8170-827073C66679@network-heretics.com> <4E9C6D88.807@gmail.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14A6D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C14A6D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by hoffman.proper.com id p9HJKPoV088965
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Given the interest, I've started putting together a BCP.  It's now posted as draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp; comments welcome.  It is only an outline right now, and I'll fill it in as people make suggestions about topics it should cover and/or start providing text to include.

It doesn't touch the SMTP extension people are discussing.  Someone else can champion that one if so inclined.  It shouldn't go in a BCP because it doesn't even exist yet.  This document will only describe current and historic practices.

Maybe we can get it on the docket for Taipei.  I'll send out some friendly pings.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email