Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 10 April 2007 20:41 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l3AKffDZ091073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:41:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id l3AKffnj091072; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:41:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l3AKfKfH091003 for <ietf-smtp@imc.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:41:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from alexey.melnikov@isode.com)
Received: from [172.16.1.99] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <Rhv2bwAkQk9R@rufus.isode.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:41:19 +0100
Message-ID: <461BF63E.8030503@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:40:30 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ned+ietf-smtp@mrochek.com
CC: ietf-smtp@imc.org
Subject: Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis
References: <45F2910C.2080008@isode.com> <EBC25ACD0F1EFCDCE04A2D94@p3.JCK.COM> <45F57E56.6040609@isode.com> <7DBD9989C72B5F6521CF3141@p3.JCK.COM> <45F5E7D5.2080206@att.com> <45F6CA10.2562@xyzzy.claranet.de> <461B2605.2090800@att.com> <461BCCA8.64CA@xyzzy.claranet.de> <01MF972YALS8000053@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01MF972YALS8000053@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

ned+ietf-smtp@mrochek.com wrote:

>>5.7.8, 5.7.9, 5.7.11, 4,7.12, 5.7.12, and x.5.6.
>>    
>>
>All of these have are consistently defined in 2554bis and in Tony's draft. If
>Tony's draft moves forward and is approved before 2554bis
>
This wouldn't be possible, as 2554bis is already approved ;-).

>is published 2554bis
>will need to be revised to use the proper registration templates. But this can
>easily be done with an RFC Editor note.  
>