Re: [ietf-types] The application/www-form-urlencoded format

Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> Sun, 26 September 2010 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ian@hixie.ch>
X-Original-To: ietf-types@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-types@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B703A67F1 for <ietf-types@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.476
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhNZ63kQY0y3 for <ietf-types@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pechora6.dc.icann.org (pechora6.icann.org [192.0.46.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034143A69D9 for <ietf-types@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pechora6.dc.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8QMB2HC002410 for <ietf-types@iana.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:11:41 -0400
Received: from homiemail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F7D2C006A; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=hixie.ch; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type; q=dns; s=hixie.ch; b=pw88aj02GxmIFsvgtCyAAdbRazWAo Jb3fXuZaTvXCRECY+35TpIQSQ8C0eYg6S+LaZHWHMLyXVON/loZ/s0otyGkISBHw p/G218CLLbuAMU0/BGvZsNFxPJ7GzPuja9pcEbjMqYf025M6A8JezsTjWK4hZwaK +FSDJIyQbTwJgE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=hixie.ch; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type; s=hixie.ch; bh=H20kCVLOSB9rUl3CpOK8X0TZrVw=; b=3sD zEbd7DtLCl7V4Y1PcpTq3HsYgiIRkGh39pD9PontfORAg6zGMQNouUHKqKvOP6yE pvH+mLZyS0jTFUrvgqeeNGizhQI/sRaFXTEd24lK7xI1SSmyH5ET5xMAPeQ5oVKL MnjDGvIjGqRlhumS2I3SOEDoI9cNG56ATbloOK9M=
Received: from ps20323.dreamhostps.com (ps20323.dreamhost.com [69.163.222.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: internal@index.hixie.ch) by homiemail-a55.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ADFD2C0061; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:11:01 +0000
From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <0ifv961b9n7fqfgfdut6bjtlnqfkgqcegp@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009262210240.3271@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
References: <k1os96p03o78p78490hei104biadpiepit@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <op.vjmuz10364w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local> <679v96hgl3jqatro4epeqlneqoms020uhe@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <op.vjnqdzm664w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local> <0ifv961b9n7fqfgfdut6bjtlnqfkgqcegp@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Content-Language: en-GB-hixie
Content-Style-Type: text/css
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (pechora6.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.71]); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:11:43 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: ietf-types@iana.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-types] The application/www-form-urlencoded format
X-BeenThere: ietf-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Media \(MIME\) type review" <ietf-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-types>, <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-types>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-types>, <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:11:24 -0000

On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> >I suppose. And I guess if we ever decide to implement any of this we could  
> >make more specific requirements in the forms section of HTML for that  
> >class of implementors.
> 
> That would be reasonable, although I would expect the rules for this
> type and the "x-" type to be the same except for the separator.
> 
> >After having thought about it some more I am doubting this would be a very  
> >useful addition though. The benefit over application/x-www-form-urlencoded  
> >seems marginal. Not high enough to warrant the cost.
> 
> My interest is in having a proper reference for the format for use in
> other protocols, where application/x-www-form-urlencoded already works
> supporting application/www-form-urlencoded is indeed not very important.

May I suggest using a different name in that case? Having two so similarly 
named types in active use would be quite confusing.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'