Re: [ietf-types] Registration for application/microdata+json

"Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org> Wed, 08 August 2012 16:00 UTC

Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:00:47 +0900
From: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <20120808160045.GE70332@sideshowbarker>
References: <20120807115025.GK67292@sideshowbarker> <00c901cd7544$44c8d210$ce5a7630$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00c901cd7544$44c8d210$ce5a7630$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/0488deb39a35+poontang (2012-05-24 22:02:57+09:00)
Cc: ietf-types@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-types] Registration for application/microdata+json
Precedence: list

Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 2012-08-08 11:00 +0200:

> Michael,
> 
> I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this question, so if it's not
> please tell me.
> I was wondering whether it was considered to use JSON-LD [1] instead of
> creating application/microdata+json. The resulting output would be more or
> less the same.

I see that you've since posted about this over on the whatwg mailing list.
I think that's the best place to discuss it, so let's see how things
progress over there.

  --Mike

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: [ietf-types] Registration for application/mic… Markus Lanthaler
[ietf-types] Registration for application/microda… Michael[tm] Smith
Re: [ietf-types] Registration for application/mic… Michael[tm] Smith
Re: [ietf-types] Registration for application/mic… Markus Lanthaler