IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-types] Status of application/patch or text/patch?

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Fri, 20 July 2012 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7D121F85D3 for <ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 05:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eTBUWKxhu-Em for <ietf-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 05:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E3CD421F85C6 for <ietf-types@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 05:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2012 12:12:57 -0000
Received: from p5B232442.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO netb.fritz.box) [91.35.36.66] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 20 Jul 2012 14:12:57 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+En7RFfP6EU3bDqEthWolqqzQGTBXiORH5dmQpCm EVvZ4PNMm7J5Jg
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:13:01 +0200
Message-ID: <nlii08hr4iatmckce26oh8fq9u9o1fv31k@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <CAMHjJ=Sr+pVyqSCZeJw5ECjWHjSpeu1+womAxeAO6VQCv8aT6g@mail.gmail.com> <87k3y03q69.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <50086D95.7080004@gmx.de> <87txx2yay1.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <50093E36.1000107@gmx.de> <vmfi08t6tr0n8aisarmurigm7f8h4j484i@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <50094599.3090804@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <50094599.3090804@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>, ietf-types@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-types] Status of application/patch or text/patch?
X-BeenThere: ietf-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Media \(MIME\) type review" <ietf-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-types>, <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-types>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-types>, <mailto:ietf-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:12:08 -0000

* Julian Reschke wrote:
>So do you believe we need a variant that is encoding-agnostics except 
>for CRLF detection?

Certainly. An "encoding-aware" variant seems much less necessary.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email