Hello

[parks at eeel.nist.gov (Parks)]

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/attachments/20040526/8d43fe51/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Readme.cpl
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/attachments/20040526/8d43fe51/Readme.obj
>From [e-mail]  Thu May 27 14:43:37 2004
From: parks at eeel.nist.gov (Parks)
Date: Thu May 27 13:41:47 2004
Subject: Thanks :)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/attachments/20040527/6059ad4b/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: the_message.cpl
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/attachments/20040527/6059ad4b/the_message.obj
>From [e-mail]  Thu May 27 19:17:17 2004
From: stpeter at jabber.org (Peter Saint-Andre)
Date: Thu May 27 19:17:36 2004
Subject: For review: draft-ietf-xmpp-e2e-07
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
	<[e-mail]>
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>

On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 08:10:02PM +0900, MURATA Makoto wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 25 May 2004 17:07:17 -0500
> Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Feedback on this registration would be appreciated before this I-D is 
> > sent to the IESG for consideration (it has already been pointed out 
> > that the registrant should be the IESG, not the WG).
> 
> Please reference to RFC 3023 (XML Media Types).
> 
> The technical content of 9.1 is fine, but please follow 
> 7.1 "Referencing" of RFC 3023 more closely.  For example, 
> since security considerations for application/xml apply 
> to the proposed media type, RFC 3023 should be mentioned.

Thank you for the corrections. I have addressed these issues in my 
working copy, which I plan to submit either today or early next week.

Peter