Re: Introducing : Brand-new Internet Protocol "Five Fields"

Alexey Eromenko <al4321@gmail.com> Mon, 14 December 2015 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <al4321@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE091B2EE9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:51:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id naYNy3ULoKYS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B391B2EE6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iow186 with SMTP id 186so40179166iow.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:51:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=ITtaWmX6pbCEljIlkuKngtoufIluhsZZA601daQtD/0=; b=uv8N4YJ1m/+iyelUxNMS5e3Cjn8zXVzcx1HGHqEQY/sxykjlBrfVI0Qf9VtU8BNWgE Qx28wU3rN4X8UnKgcWg7GQpi4Ee/f4Tul+EuDdgk+Y63t1tdX9+AEvsRdhMoBFsvjnKs Aiz3flx7N00Lf5J1q/2lhI4SmCydEw3iT+xKZmuVAYD6xwaPVnr8EAS2pmk1x4g471lO WZtXtn8f0jmmLwNQcK4ICITsqWUJHNr/6/EgwRW3K0d89e+B8P7THc6YlGCNSPI7uDX6 ScODXQ2w8nKiwnao7zzrdtVrwLPL+Tv4bI87dOPyhh/AD6uiyeF9bIOBFdvebEK3GcoL nAEg==
X-Received: by 10.107.32.131 with SMTP id g125mr18092887iog.131.1450126306168; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:51:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.136.156 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:51:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <566F1B2D.8000405@comcast.net>
References: <566A9AB8.8020509@alvestrand.no> <2085283165.999407.1450066234676.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <20151214072349.50765e68@localhost> <566F1B2D.8000405@comcast.net>
From: Alexey Eromenko <al4321@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:51:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOJ6w=EnQj5t-tOzyH9TFQEhEaU+vWippipEE7Ca5sStzmD0xg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Introducing : Brand-new Internet Protocol "Five Fields"
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-S4WkiivAX6iZ3_FtPzDSqrARFM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:51:47 -0000

>
> At this point I would suggest that the discussion on this topic has exceeded
> the mandate for the list.  I would suggest that creating a separate list and
> announcing it and moving all further discussion on the specifics of this
> proposal to that list would be appropriate.
>
> At the beginning of this discussion the question was asked of why the
> sergeant at arms threatened posting restriction.  I wasn't actually
> surprised at that PR warning as we've already got a replacement for IPv4 in
> the form of IPv6.   It took us over 20 years to get from initial discussions
> to reasonable deployments and we're still working on it. The form of the
> proposal - BCD representation of IP addresses as its best claim to fame -
> initially led me to believe it was a troll proposal rather than something
> serious.  I now see the author believes it to be a serious proposal, but I
> also believe that it's 20 years too late and provides no benefit over IPv6.
> I'm willing to be shown wrong, but I'd really like not to read further
> discussions about it on this list until there's something of a buy in from a
> greater crowd.
>
> Mike

Fair enough.

1. How to create a mailing-list, (or Working Group) ?
2. Should I do it inside / as-part-of IETF, or some 3rd party resource ?

-- 
-Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"