Re: [discuss] Questions

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 21 December 2015 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8826A1AC3EE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:11:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U6YTP4Ffp2Um for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53F311AC3E8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745FC2002A; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:17:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE6C6379D; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:11:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Subject: Re: [discuss] Questions
In-Reply-To: <561DC422-D37E-4B6E-ADBC-BA74B7B73889@pch.net>
References: <A0576F06-5117-4E61-B7F3-2C9AD4E9D069@yahoo.com> <561DC422-D37E-4B6E-ADBC-BA74B7B73889@pch.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:11:06 -0500
Message-ID: <16795.1450725066@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-VXF3BhUpvPL0laTTlGU2YxKCKA>
Cc: Nathalie Coupet <nathaliecoupet@yahoo.com>, "internetpolicy@elists.isoc.org" <internetpolicy@elists.isoc.org>, "discuss@1net.org" <discuss@1net.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:11:08 -0000

Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> wrote:
    > Oh, and serial ports.  Those started out as DB-25, then DB-9, then
    > RJ-45, and now mini-USB, emulating serial ports.  People briefly tried
    > bluetooth emulating serial ports, but there were too many ways for that
    > to go wrong.

I learnt recently that the telco's have a term I'd never heard of before to
describe those serial ports: "craft terminals".

(They are immensively valuable when you need them, and very annoying in many
places to get approved by managers)


-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-