IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: mailarchive: Bogus DNSSEC signature

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 21 July 2016 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0A612D7E9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NhoUhcsr4uXV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3516212D7E8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A206300423 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:16:38 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id bEXNQefzBfHg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:16:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [5.5.33.73] (vpn.snozzages.com [204.42.252.17]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D4BA300265; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:16:35 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: mailarchive: Bogus DNSSEC signature
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_658692F7-C28D-4D8F-AF9C-462B29DB2E7F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <a4698a7a-f0a3-88f0-8f70-7fe9d4e4d3dd@restena.lu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:16:17 -0400
Message-Id: <A8DE716A-7784-4B8C-A934-DCC6811C591A@vigilsec.com>
References: <a4698a7a-f0a3-88f0-8f70-7fe9d4e4d3dd@restena.lu>
To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-hHWJl-JReR7N0J07BWw7Y7vcf0>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:16:52 -0000

None of these online tools are seeing a problem:

http://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/ietf.org
http://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/mailarchive.ietf.org
http://dnsviz.net/d/mailarchive.ietf.org/dnssec/

Russ

On Jul 21, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> see attached screenshot. Shouldn't we be doing better than this?
> 
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> 
> Stefan Winter
> 
> 
> <Bildschirmfoto 2016-07-21 um 11.53.01.png><0x8A39DC66.asc>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email