Re: Working Group Last Call -- draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-02

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 03 May 2017 02:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0AF1273E2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 19:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j06CSCfxgtCb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2017 19:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3256812E035 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2017 19:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.3.104] (unknown [124.189.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01A5B22E253 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2017 22:01:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call -- draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-02
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 12:01:42 +1000
References: <AA8A7700-C76C-46E8-A5DD-085D79C90A6C@mnot.net>
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <AA8A7700-C76C-46E8-A5DD-085D79C90A6C@mnot.net>
Message-Id: <98C372E0-BD51-48F5-9CE4-BEA74E35F5FE@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0eT5vVlwkjh9e2r_Nh-np8SOJuw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 02:04:48 -0000

Sorry, bad mail completion. Ignore this...

> On 3 May 2017, at 11:57 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> Everyone,
> 
> Patrick (as editor) feels that we're ready for WGLC on this draft, and there are no open issues.
> 
> Please have a look at:
>  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-02
> 
> and raise any issues that you see (here or on the issues list). Statements of support or planned implementation would also be helpful in judging consensus, so don't be shy.
> 
> WGLC will end in two weeks, on 17 May.
> 
> Regards,
> 


Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/