IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17
worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 07 October 2016 20:41 UTC
Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA07129712 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nwgLbSyq8vYM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01061296FA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.104]) by resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id sbvxbokNZxBKTsbxIbPa80; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:41:20 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([73.16.37.18]) by resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id sbxHby4A4JmjpsbxHbXFjT; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:41:20 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u97KfIxF030776; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:41:18 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u97KfI4N030773; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:41:18 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-restconf.all@ietf.org
Subject: IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 16:41:18 -0400
Message-ID: <87wphj51u9.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOZ9Q6/7nDt0h62tKpvqedCuRgxtMGgg3UgcLhvLRahkh9OVu/wQgBO/bvhJ+a4Pc8YAlF9OaKy0ypqeU158WBHT4+2oBVKEEPrlfEFC+7uyHG0+5MR1 T4CmYmOdT+O5f3F9K7tmPsEOLbGkcAQjS1p8twZXQl7q6A9B6xbkNHXr78NhcIxlfUnPJV6wTS0AxnBXl/9g4Pix2rfBavyP44RpvYlFgFZkB/oEbzjQmPAl ohyTIJqxdDh4yST4igTksA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/17QoM05-Y6c63UA7FoQnbqtgMms>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:41:24 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17 Reviewer: Dale R. Worley Review Date: 2016-10-07 IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-03 IESG Telechat date: 2016-10-13 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC. This is a comparison of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17 against my review for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-16. In my opinion, all review items have been resolved. I am repeating the following item because its resolution is by recognizing an error in the referenced RFC 6415, which perhaps ought to be considered by the IESG: The draft makes use of reltive URLs as values of the href attribute of the Link element in XRD documents (RFC 6415). Relative links are not usually considered to be "URIs", but rather "URI-references" (RFC 3986 section 4.1), and RFC 6415 uses "URI" consistently, not "URI-reference". Also, all examples in RFC 6415 show complete URIs. Note that the above issue has been resolved with the understanding that RFC 6415 is incorrectly stated, and it seems to have always been intended to allow relative URLs in XRD: Compare with its source, Extensible Resource Descriptor (XRD) Version 1.0 (http://docs.oasis-open.org/xri/xrd/v1.0/xrd-1.0.html) sections 2.6 and 1.5.2. This issue has been filed as erratum 4811 to RFC 6415 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=4811). Dale
- IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netcon… Dale R. Worley
- Re: IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ne… Jari Arkko