Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 30 April 2020 15:01 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED55C3A0B5D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.218
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.218 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.82, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id szN-yDj2rleM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f44.google.com (mail-io1-f44.google.com [209.85.166.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43C3B3A0AE9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f44.google.com with SMTP id z2so1770559iol.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hV5CYLfbJEBd2ep0lZcBxZUMuYt/PgBZWTjN35c/mc4=; b=V2aYxXkV0e6mimBEN+fxeHyd5hCulO+X17TsThAeQsIOCKuduDVOL1061OwVD2XbhS 3cZrwv0IEwXL+jaflpD4rk7sJiEapSxKgWQshi9XummgKlQpfAE1gQnlAKiMo+PY4WBb z+2sUI0UmcmBZL7Cj4NKuLK0pi8tQdRL0Jis5cRMHI402jr3yl8zvI6kOlpCjjLlAk0K yOaNpGOSSLQyyrplEAckQWIu0wa74UN6AYmAVviVuDVEdvciJjMKuSbQHQo+RRwXUYvT yIbbadwPArzc/d/G8qn1mPpZgxsU60p0VchZUOWqD5cyHHxlXavk/4vdOC/M9EKDGqF9 TO8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ2Aqnihxv19gZzmo9LXpUtiUqAHGyz9BraJ7W+5AtPBSgKPvDz Jjz0n78KqbvrqykdZoIpqtFQZNgiEhPmr8Yexo7bip7U5Xg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIQdcdIftpPZjJ1KHNt+YoTgiVbncoSbUUazWqj+1fhwc1E3wxDNM8RHVMixnNPomANdA5goyHi4k+GOwq7eyI=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8613:: with SMTP id z19mr2251657ioj.84.1588258853861; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:00:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLEYak1dYJazaN1QSvjTzW3o-nSCA6XOuTP=sZ+yyzhMA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailing list experiment
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1Jum0QW3b6AATJXF31P3g7IpUF4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:01:36 -0000
It's been around six months since we started the <last-call@ietf.org> list, and we said that we would evaluate the results after six months. To that end, the IESG would like to see comments about how it's been working. Please respond to this thread to comment. It would be helpful if the first line of your comment gave a succinct view of your opinion on the following 5-to-1 scale: 5: Perfect! Don't even think about going back! 4: I really like it and want to keep it. 3: Neutral: I don't care either way. 2: I don't like it, but I can live with it if we decide to keep it. 1: It's terrible! Please, please go back to the old way! And, of course, if you have further comments beyond those numbers, include those as well. We want to know what you think. Comments, please, in the next couple of weeks, by 15 May. Thanks! Barry, for the IESG
- Six months in: evaluation of the last-call mailin… Barry Leiba
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Jared Mauch
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Scott Kitterman
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Salz, Rich
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… John Levine
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Ben Campbell
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Barry Leiba
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Russ Housley
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Joseph Touch
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Pete Resnick
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Tim Chown
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … John C Klensin
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … tom petch
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … ned+ietf
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Adam Roach
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Patrick McManus
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Tommy Pauly
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Keith Moore
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Christian Hopps
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Keith Moore
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Ben Campbell
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Job Snijders
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Dave Lawrence
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Christopher Wood
- RE: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Richard Barnes
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Barry Leiba
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Keith Moore
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… S Moonesamy
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Rob Sayre
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Randy Bush
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Loa Andersson
- Re: Six months in: evaluation of the last-call ma… Doug Royer
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Martin Thomson
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Matthew A. Miller
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Barry Leiba
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Bob Hinden
- recommendations for Last Call email processing (w… Keith Moore
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Barry Leiba
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Adam Roach
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Timothy J. Salo
- Re: [Last-Call] Six months in: evaluation of the … Rob Sayre