Re: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-10
Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Sat, 22 September 2018 20:47 UTC
Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411E7130E5B; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 13:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ig_iTf3F_1fa; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 13:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out02.uio.no (mail-out02.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EC9412426A; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 13:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx01.uio.no ([129.240.10.26]) by mail-out02.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1g3onz-0004Ol-8a; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:47:07 +0200
Received: from 58.116.34.95.customer.cdi.no ([95.34.116.58] helo=[10.0.0.7]) by mail-mx01.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1g3ony-0001op-9V; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:47:07 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-10
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <153755698602.7385.1208927554172233101@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:48:42 +0200
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-taps-minset.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7C959283-AFBA-4C24-839A-C6FCBC3EF4BB@ifi.uio.no>
References: <153755698602.7385.1208927554172233101@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx01.uio.no: 95.34.116.58 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=95.34.116.58; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=[10.0.0.7];
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 8DAA90C41EBE5AF7EB55FE5647EBFDE9567C6580
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/23966IF18noAPYwinPG4K2qcXig>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 20:47:15 -0000
Dear Linda, Thanks for your feedback! I’d like to address your last comment, but I’m not sure how. I agree with what you say, but it sounds as if you felt provoked by a specific sentence or paragraph - could you please point me at the text that you think needs changing? Thanks! Cheers, Michael > On Sep 21, 2018, at 9:09 PM, Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com> wrote: > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready > > Hi, > > I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of > the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included > in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should > treat these comments just like any other last call comments. > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Almost Ready, with comments > > During my review period, the authors have updated the drafts twice, which have > addressed many of my previous comments well. > > Only one more comment: Can you provide some sample "Applications" that actually > do differently depending on the Host OS' Transport capability? All the > "Applications" I know of usually finalize on which Transport Protocols to use > and which transport layer capability is necessary and can only be placed on the > Host OS that meet the requirement. > > Thank you. > > Linda Dunbar > > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-taps-minset… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Michael Welzl
- RE: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Michael Welzl
- Re: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Michael Welzl