Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108

Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Fri, 15 May 2020 10:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55453A089B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 03:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RXGn1QGmxIFZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2020 03:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D6973A0894 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 03:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.15.1/8.14.9) with SMTP id 04FA5VrG007536 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 06:05:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 06:05:22 -0400
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
Message-ID: <20200515100522.GA1838@gsp.org>
References: <2DECE3B5-26E0-4A07-9696-63EEE9E080EE@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgHUPDNtOhPhJNNHirRBOu0u1qh2shF_siXeFygjEkXqw@mail.gmail.com> <cf6d60d2-875a-e8f7-820d-266a015bfa74@network-heretics.com> <CAMm+LwhR+GPs9UfOBMNaX5ptt8wDWmTLB=u-Kgr7fu=V6cVAPA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhR+GPs9UfOBMNaX5ptt8wDWmTLB=u-Kgr7fu=V6cVAPA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2LSQM0_-iv3kBH8j_-mvbm2XR1E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 10:05:26 -0000

On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 11:03:39PM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> No Keith, I have a different form of pessimism. I was a control engineer at
> one point. We have a system with a high gain (R=5.7) and a long delay (14
> days before hospitalizations). So I expect we will be seeing oscillation
> with governments announcing premature lockdown lifts followed by
> re-imposition as the case load and death rate becomes unsustainable.

An apt analysis, indeed.  I share this pessimism and will add to it by
noting that while "the vaccine" is being held out as a solution, a best
case timeline for a tested-effective tested-safe vaccine has it probably
12-18 months out.  That is only the beginning: we have to hope that
it won't require refrigeration.  We have to hope that it can be administered
orally or a via a patch, that is, without syringes.  We have to hope that
billions of doses can be manufactured and distributed.  We have to hope
that an army of people are available to administer those doses.  We have
to hope that somehow all this gets paid for, because it's not an option to
just make it available to those who can afford it.  We have to hope that
(a) it confers neutralizing immunity in one dose, because if it requires
N doses then all the logistics above get multiplied by N and
(b) that the immunity is durable enough to protect recipients for a
reasonable period of time.  We have to hope that as the virus mutates
that it doesn't mutate into something the vaccine doesn't address.
We have to hope that this all happens despite the demonstrated, sustained,
profound incompetence of multiple national, state/province, and local
governments which have chosen to ignore and/or suppress scientific experts.

Given all this, a best case scenario is probably three years.  BEST case,
assuming all the things I just listed (and some that I didn't) turn out
in our favor.  Realistic case?  I don't know.   But it took a decade of
massive, coordinated, funded, global effort to eradicate smallpox.
(h/t to expert Laurie Garrett, who I'm borrowing from heavily.)

---rsk