Re: question: ISOC Panel at IETF88 in Vancouver?

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C5611E84AE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.194
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id snLDz+9ggqAL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B93D11E81CF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nephilia.intra.cea.fr (nephilia.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.33]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id r9MF6mv0006030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:06:48 +0200
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by nephilia.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9MF6mYp001694; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:06:48 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id r9MF6lsu016718; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:06:48 +0200
Message-ID: <52669487.2070507@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:06:47 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CJ Aronson <cja@daydream.com>
Subject: Re: question: ISOC Panel at IETF88 in Vancouver?
References: <52662CE2.1020709@gmail.com> <CAMvf=7YrQuU5fARSFQFC-1_hZ7C53fUn_wT1yw82hQdb4JAn7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMvf=7YrQuU5fARSFQFC-1_hZ7C53fUn_wT1yw82hQdb4JAn7g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:06:56 -0000

Le 22/10/2013 16:16, CJ Aronson a écrit :
> http://www.internetsociety.org/internet-society-briefing-panel-ietf-88
>
> Just found it.

Thanks, IPv6 success deployments is of much interest.

Alex

>
> ----Cathy
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Alexandru Petrescu
> <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello IETFers,
>
>     Is there going to be an ISOC Panel this time at IETF 88 in Vancouver?
>
>     Alex
>
>