IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Review of draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04

Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com> Mon, 10 November 2008 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EBC3A67F9; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:12:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354513A67F9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:12:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.704
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.355, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F3qrYqVmomxf for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3805A3A63EB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id A39902186F; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:11:54 +0100 (CET)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-ad783bb00000537b-ad-4917eccaee63
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.124]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 93AB120330; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:11:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:11:53 +0100
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:11:51 +0100
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7137725B2; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:11:51 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446464DABE; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:11:51 +0200 (EET)
Message-Id: <746CA57D-BDCE-45D8-9A2D-234C0EFC1876@ericsson.com>
From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>
To: "\"Rémi Denis-Courmont\"" <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <200811101003.57801.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:11:50 +0200
References: <3873DF72-B768-427B-A6F5-99778DF5DC02@ericsson.com> <200811071318.57917.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> <D4F2E4C9-A6BC-4DDA-8695-CEC9E8CAAFA4@ericsson.com> <200811101003.57801.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2008 08:11:51.0618 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC77CA20:01C9430B]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, Behave Chairs <behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:

>> endpoint independent mapping and filtering enables address referrals
>> between application instances (which use the same port number).  This
>> advantage is independent of the transport protocol and the connection
>> model.  The exceptions you are listing are special cases for NAT'ing
>> in general, not only with regard to the usefulness of endpoint
>> independent mapping and filtering.
>
> I don't disagree... Lets say that endpoint independent mapping is  
> one half
> of a solution. We need another half: either a "simultaneous hole  
> punching"
> mechanism, (and/)or endpoint independent _filtering_...

Maybe that was our misunderstanding:  Yes, we need both, endpoint- 
independent
mapping /and/ filtering.  But re-read my email; I in fact talked about  
both.

- Christian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email