Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database"

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2013 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4713011E8281 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.463
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GuNxXKJtybkr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B3111E8160 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hr7so4816519wib.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Lnuw7ZCancDbvGKE5vnH7deYktGSwrsNdj3gHsJSjeY=; b=e9oY3hfCwLxlqjTfMiBHHDw4MgPoi7foGfcvTw/CE+J2pweOQQ+pPAPuOP0KVC6NlZ G43C7IR6a4VxsT9IMEGBkAbvO6Me2gk71f8Ix1O2FlraCIsTVx+drAcn7oiX2LBnr3yi d4BH6duWDHPLQHZj95udxu2HVtPh4Qzw0w/yY8hoTHLf55/RV9i0mjbCO3JkXC+/lBV5 icP5DBOeST685vlS1WvM75G2/BQYLVXOTyGIsP8FsO2iKNF3brVCpxg2oy7jTlc5tInp bLmgLbg8PAEq+j9t1wBBsTVAPEzEfW8JbvW+utwU4bCywhCYR/WdvUu4pJaPd9Jbb+EM CskQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.72.104 with SMTP id c8mr13711131wiv.63.1377030418396; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.6.67 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <520E7ADD.9060509@gmail.com>
References: <9F1A328F-12F4-4299-9604-CAA5019005C3@iab.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20130815114542.0c4e8780@resistor.net> <6E29F0AB625F4250CB35B273@192.168.1.128> <520E7ADD.9060509@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:26:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwi7z0S6HR5R8NpZ_J6WNACmPjP2ZxM+GD4Gx0UK4qgNTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database"
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2b5b2ef008904e466e059"
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, SM <sm@resistor.net>, IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:27:06 -0000

I am having trouble understanding this discussion.

If the data is in a database then surely the production of RFC xx00
standards series is simply running an automated query on the database and
emitting the result as an RFC?