Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15

Dino Farinacci <> Mon, 27 August 2018 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C1F130DE2; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zbdLVR_tS8ed; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 402EA1277C8; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id b11-v6so6928187pfo.3; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=f2D+zQzXcD645BJfDeDot299V9sIWuAuD4DgAKHEqyc=; b=AI4HkHuuPzt4ikYGDQUSHbsWUBnO4Kul8qbj2dXgBrNhqKMndueBWClaYd9rhwHu6M 3x3SHeaxSVYerAd0jlK4gegWg/hk0dqHSFS1doXDP2Z4ydOdd2TNjt63E1AbsrsUj4z9 h468Ljw2Ot0qBoSQl9oeHh5LsY+9H00hNtqrYmaGtyZ2giQdD5p4NmjB/d2r1yeLD6d9 27+Vbx/WGHeZGGBcZ67FVNghyOeeywbbNt4C20XThgmF+Ju/VMhgumuTOfy9wPANrile y2I7JFXV8kDkjTfzpvGRiIWxSToq0FILVRH1fgF8cqejUswd3ewWVuXYNcNCjx7k2y1L wVcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=f2D+zQzXcD645BJfDeDot299V9sIWuAuD4DgAKHEqyc=; b=SdHvq2ARCvjCCh3fzTFLRvjquGUZfY2kYeJppjAxro0ZaDFtRwBJL0ALna5QQEXn5v +yJBYa619TSzyyU7YpkNoZ+D3nU2OQ0rRUYosG1WspWlIFTwi9wdRW5g51qd6BN19FTz WdEXn2/3VdQaZ6PlobpHD3GnrE2aNEm3OsxlBTvS+R1bVGxvtjvVoSLVNRCuf3LlWLD+ zYkQ9/Qey691TgGkw/SJnPXmH5QSvrB4GwaK7bN4AMjVdVRcX8tvEJiPUyLVEYOnyNLu /9gaLHlgtwsH6/9GktUiRQTnaplbn+Yy/QVSI/gAQt7RS1tacDc4MsGhTqipDagwDJrC eMJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AfEsIKHFUj3kD76ZLkMrpSPaG9gn20rqpL08u53SQHc7koX9YX P0IuQVMJKDwrl4d+B1cb/yg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaLrEMNrgN3jozPajvvtpMqPRqekYkFWkF1/f0wcm83DTMINUwS9bnyDwVeFuSs0niqxST/Lg==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:fcd2:: with SMTP id e201-v6mr12057492pfh.101.1535332750774; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:8534:1feb:3042:68f0:cdae:2918? ([2600:380:8534:1feb:3042:68f0:cdae:2918]) by with ESMTPSA id s75-v6sm21326610pfd.108.2018. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
From: Dino Farinacci <>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15G77)
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:19:09 -0700
Cc: Kyle Rose <>,, " list" <>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <>,
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <> <>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <>
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 01:19:12 -0000

> If the PSK does get additionally purposed for encryption, please make sure
> to use a modern key derivation hierarchy to provide separation between the
> authentication and encryption usages.

I would venture to say we wouldn’t use the PSK for that. Our options are to negotiate a shared session key with the asymmetric keys already being used, use DTLS or TLS, or use lisp-crypto and have control messages encapsulated I the LISP data-plane. And yes, the later has 6 cipher suites with combinations of all the latest and greatest in Crypto (but not Edward Curves).