Re: draft-ietf-cat-ftpsec-09.txt

[der Mouse <[e-mail]>]

>> [M]y point was not so much that CCC is or isn't useless, as that the
>> document seems to contradict itself, saying that CCC must be
>> integrity protected and then stating fairly directly that it is
>> possible to operate without implementing the command that would be
>> necessary to get that integrity protection.

> I can reword the text to say something like "... and not implement
> the protection commands in the general case."  How's that?

That would be fine with me.

					der Mouse