RE: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-07

Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D2812989D; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 00:31:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H_32o8dPqB_w; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 00:31:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5BAF1295FE; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 00:31:43 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-fb9fc980000059d1-8c-589c28ed39f4
Received: from ESESSHC021.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.81]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id D9.3B.22993.DE82C985; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:31:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (153.88.183.145) by oa.msg.ericsson.com (153.88.183.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:31:23 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ericsson-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Opzmum3vrTlDoMwN+f7/18te9S+O6jTfEreJn48V4qI=; b=Lx2iEP7y7jyLy+VS9kLNCJ04NPc12GfBaK3l3lK8TbL/wQOaBXCrFS29IvpThEVH1NYg/PvHdxS0A99DrynzXfxAImWgnPtAQaLaxJxvaR/bGmI76zII54GjhUGIVFT4BcXBwMq6Wu48u8de50JDNAkI1+Hv8yncx1NhBtPDuVU=
Received: from AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.162.37.152) by AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.162.37.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.888.5; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:31:20 +0000
Received: from AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.37.152]) by AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.37.152]) with mapi id 15.01.0888.025; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:31:20 +0000
From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: RE: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-07
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-07
Thread-Index: AQHSfnRknsTURaNSRU6G5sP6JBParKFb3HyAgAAVk9CAAFB/AIABAp2AgACGiQCAARhlUIAA8DWAgACMNTA=
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:31:20 +0000
Message-ID: <AM2PR07MB0994E21E54B10F7AC0416452F0450@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <148616413998.4157.2652633501511666882.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2ACBB603-E990-4C86-BE83-4FCC741C254B@piuha.net> <AM2PR07MB0994EB1B4B526A4D7A385E8EF0400@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <98F6A1A1-2444-4782-99A6-3F5532FE1F63@qti.qualcomm.com> <AM2PR07MB0994A0EE3F25F2BDF4FA20D4F0430@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <74FF9057-1D46-4213-B4F0-CFEBC2AB0CA8@qti.qualcomm.com> <AM2PR07MB0994B673F4904750FC2746B1F0420@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <6DF6F8D6-53F9-4772-A2CB-A8B750C24EF9@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <6DF6F8D6-53F9-4772-A2CB-A8B750C24EF9@qti.qualcomm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [151.0.200.100]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 64df4e46-ed44-4eb4-2671-08d450c60665
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:AM2PR07MB0994;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM2PR07MB0994; 7: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
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM2PR07MB09941719747952AE384F01EDF0450@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(37575265505322)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123558025)(6072148); SRVR:AM2PR07MB0994; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM2PR07MB0994;
x-forefront-prvs: 02135EB356
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(7916002)(39450400003)(51914003)(199003)(189002)(24454002)(101416001)(54356999)(74316002)(7696004)(3660700001)(81166006)(4326007)(7906003)(230783001)(7736002)(66066001)(93886004)(50986999)(105586002)(229853002)(54896002)(106356001)(81156014)(76176999)(55016002)(54906002)(33656002)(99286003)(5660300001)(236005)(8936002)(6306002)(9686003)(25786008)(122556002)(38730400002)(189998001)(102836003)(6436002)(77096006)(68736007)(6916009)(606005)(966004)(106116001)(6506006)(53936002)(8676002)(2950100002)(6116002)(6246003)(86362001)(92566002)(53546003)(97736004)(2900100001)(790700001)(110136004)(3280700002)(2906002)(3846002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM2PR07MB0994; H:AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM2PR07MB0994E21E54B10F7AC0416452F0450AM2PR07MB0994eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Feb 2017 08:31:20.5246 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM2PR07MB0994
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA02Sa0hTYRjHec852zlbTl6n5oNG5IjQSO1qM8rM+iCpVPRBi6hmHi95bUdN I2JoghqiqAWbtzJRvG0lajrMUtNIKsW8pWlWw/AWlaUsbznPBL/9n/f/e97n/7y8DCnVC+yZ 8Og4VhmtiJQJxZQ68Nk5lx9OBYF7tYNb5IaCIUpetKQl5P1Tc5R84mkxJe/rv0t6CXxKS42E T8n9CXSWuCg+GsxGhiewSjfPq+KwcW0yFZtdjBILU+sJFfqpQRlIxAA+CA+WiwQZSMxIsRaB oWdKyBevEeQMaAkTReFMEnoWQ3gjj4DFninEFx0Iet910RmIYYT4CBja/EwNNngP5BU2kSaG xF8R1L8y0ibDGvvCy4Famof8wNjUTfI6CGaHGkl+2k5Y1s2t55PgS5DTXWLOV0bB9+fzQtMw ET4F6k8eJgbhrbDQVb2elMR2MGwoJvjdMJQ28/cDtoXJbysCng8CXWqjmXGEnkqNWftDR1q1 cEM3vEinTXMBv6VANzIv4I0ImElpoHl9GvKHxgke0hDwfrDZ3L0NcheqzN3lQiibWVyPIcUs lNekIv4p7GG0Lx1lI2fNpuS8joH2/PZ1LcFW8EZtoDRrS5PYGXR6Nx5xhLx7X2heO0FqQSG9 +fwhoiuRLcdyXFTo/gOurDL8GsfFRLtGs3G1aO1HtdYtujSiqukTbQgzSGYheXI9P1AqUCRw SVFtCBhSZiNxXvtwUkmwIukWq4y5ooyPZLk25MBQMjuJe8XnACkOVcSxESwbyyo3XIIR2avQ ruQP/1qyxI+8LFdqxWrPLIfk82ma6TNjC0Wdv1SRZSEFTIuvuHSssn7wtv/JmrnHAXesnFrU 4xcO/XXTqOz0I8NBxsOaybqU7e6Z3uk7+umPrd6iWSdJZ7WXtV6/tFpRd3mVzS0hEi0Hjwe3 3jhmke1RFP/nd2VMy83e6jlWNSqjuDDFvt2kklP8B5E2LGdNAwAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/46w4gxUa9QkYopYtneYyHWdVYkk>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.all@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:31:46 -0000

Gone! ☺

Thanks to you for the careful review.

BR
Daniele

From: Pete Resnick [mailto:presnick@qti.qualcomm.com]
Sent: giovedì 9 febbraio 2017 01:08
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.all@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; ccamp@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-07


If that's what you mean, let me suggest simplifying:

OLD
At least one priority
level MUST be advertised that, unless overridden by local policy,
SHALL be at priority level 0.
NEW
At least one priority
level MUST be advertised. If only one priority level is advertised,
it MUST be at priority level 0.

Thanks for the extended discussion of this. It all looks fine.

pr

On 8 Feb 2017, at 4:14, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:

Hi Pete,



This is an “inheritance” from GMPLS, where supporting a single priority equals not supporting priorities. If you don’t want to support priorities you don’t want your traffic to be preempted…hence priority 0.



>Well, it doesn't say that shouldn't be done, but it probably doesn't need to say anything about local configurations.

For me it’s ok not to say anything on that.



Thanks

Daniele



From: Pete Resnick [mailto:presnick@qti.qualcomm.com]
Sent: martedì 7 febbraio 2017 18:05
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com<mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>>
Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net<mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net>>; gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.all@ietf.org>; ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>; ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-07



Hi Daniele,

Thanks for addressing everything. There's only one issue left in section 4.1.1 on Priority, below. I've trimmed out all the rest.

On 7 Feb 2017, at 3:36, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:

I get that part ("At least one priority level MUST be advertised"). It's the end I don't understand: "that, unless overridden by local policy, SHALL be at priority level 0." What does that mean?

[DC] It means that if only one priority is supported it has to be priority 0.

So, let me see if I have this right: It's OK to have 01100000 but not 01000000 or 00100000? If so, why is that?

For any particular administrative purpose it could be possible to set it to a different value, but that shouldn’t be done.

Well, it doesn't say that shouldn't be done, but it probably doesn't need to say anything about local configurations.

pr
--
Pete Resnick http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/<http://www.qualcomm.com/%7Epresnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478