Re: Last Call: <draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-04.txt> (The Item and Collection Link Relations) to Informational RFC

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 11 December 2011 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E2221F86A1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:23:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y4Jx0r1mQSs5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0533921F853A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:23:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pBB0NXih027149; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:23:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1323563018; bh=QU55B59q/6+3EtjnzZk9pdTrV5EciLPEn17KBwJg8KQ=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=MR/fcn9XXQYFpMFV0Ozf0uOCQknfwJGPGsBz89fxGy0tnfvChn/zoMNZClKtWncuy C62U/eZpOFX4gp5DsGklSJRxRyGBfr29GTtsWOts8aionL78jU70o7Xl3ZiOW4yLrr Zx/sLfV7jg7HT6MbJNwDIJ+HPa+RAWZJSQwqc+vs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1323563018; bh=QU55B59q/6+3EtjnzZk9pdTrV5EciLPEn17KBwJg8KQ=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=OxJBcyByRVWs55m0oKyK3SAC1Vv20roB4mGKNhc77qB5RpucA2Aa4e1VVogAU2RDJ m76jVN8WKvD160bwxhqrvgBKFs/bSPsHrPsW3sMf/gg/Vmog8yDCMJ6Z0snFMyDfSD 4TjdDsxMFlO/XuD8JxrekAXu/u2Z9bX153TlltQg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111210155651.088d7160@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:07:19 -0800
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-04.txt> (The Item and Collection Link Relations) to Informational RFC
In-Reply-To: <4EE3DA8F.3010708@isode.com>
References: <20111208181228.14371.71316.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4EE3DA8F.3010708@isode.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:23:43 -0000

At 14:17 10-12-2011, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>Nit: The first use of IRI needs a reference, most likely Normative.

As a nit, the author of the draft could get away with a normative 
reference to RFC 5988 as the text refers to "Context IRI" and "Target IRI".

The above is also applicable for draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00.

Regards,
-sm