IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Fri, 29 July 2011 05:12 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B88C21F881C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TpafNawxEZO0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6948121F87BC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 37251 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2011 05:12:11 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:vbr-info:user-agent:cleverness; s=9182.4e32412b.k1107; bh=vpBj9QCyjddJdSqZGH3iIqZUOBGa3Y2A5zbF25gnQIg=; b=SzUZdCP3EmyDbdyvVjleJFpti8ENfmvSyDVzZHF2Au63cqbQd+i7OsDq/oVf0jAmqXaS73BghU9JZREX4BrXMXroUmLnoC7J3ZboQlDmE9kn4tjfcKq3ls4EfP1YpbHNM7upxqKCdkLGKBPa+4FQnr6X81nbX806FqnPhzZxxa4=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1) with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 29 Jul 2011 05:11:49 -0000
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:12:08 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107290109250.20876@joyce.lan>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: "t.petch" <daedulus@btconnect.com>
Subject: Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
In-Reply-To: <005d01cc4d44$3136eda0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <20110725171748.GA13506@amsl.com> <4E2FFFDF.2080601@ieca.com> <4E2DAF60.8030307@dcrocker.net> <005d01cc4d44$3136eda0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; BOUNDARY="3825401791-1445651086-1311916331=:20876"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:12:14 -0000

> But more importantly we have abolished the end-to-end principle.  If I am going
> to benefit from improved security on e-mail, I want to from the originator to
> me, not some half-way house giving a spurious impression of accuracy.

I can't help but be baffled at the lack of a PGP or S/MIME signature on 
your message.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email