Re: are we the ISDTF? was: Let's look at it from an IETF oldie's perspective... Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary
Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Thu, 20 December 2007 20:37 UTC
Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J5S96-0008JR-OE; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:37:32 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J5S95-0008JC-3L for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:37:31 -0500
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org ([69.25.196.178]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J5S94-0007f0-Qn for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:37:31 -0500
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 08A4D4815; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:37:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: john.loughney@gmail.com
References: <lbGlTGJg2QZg.HKwZYdBj@smtp.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:37:24 -0500
In-Reply-To: <lbGlTGJg2QZg.HKwZYdBj@smtp.gmail.com> (john loughney's message of "Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:34:36 +0200")
Message-ID: <tslzlw5drwb.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Cc: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: are we the ISDTF? was: Let's look at it from an IETF oldie's perspective... Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
>>>>> "john" == john loughney <john.loughney@gmail.com> writes: john> Are we the Internet Standardization Development Task Force? john> It seems by this thread, many of us are afraid to do any john> engineering and just work on emails and paper. I *knew* there was some reason I didn't like ISDs from newtrk:-) _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- are we the ISDTF? was: Let's look at it from an I… john.loughney
- Re: are we the ISDTF? was: Let's look at it from … Marshall Eubanks
- Re: are we the ISDTF? was: Let's look at it from … Sam Hartman
- Re: are we the ISDTF? was: Let's look at it from … Dave Crocker
- RE: are we the ISDTF? was: Let's look at it from … Hallam-Baker, Phillip