IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Sergeant-at-arms engagement model

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Fri, 11 October 2019 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05ED12006A; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QNWbztWM-Teb; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56314120018; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id q10so22881123iop.2; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QimCOkYQOWLC8k7kZvsFVUmfIuQyGrz78HkfnRYS240=; b=IjAGiwtlR+2def8TIm8OYGDPTSX05EbMTD16WTwszD0EuBiZ4fDz3Nu1MpEA3VwPPm yMPpd5R5APSRENsUob7RtxpVo4NJOHaW4zSwFFyBPwK5QEArlChT/Ulcq3G6LwDvZzbW T03/zVQuW+9q6cOT0SB+DdH/ehehFxNTqh+FgnA34/W2PsEtIK6PJPow0sdB9m34a02Y ZJ+Y0oqzJSJkT3KyLv00WN+uzx/w2t5xEeAQCjcwKh2i177pL7yKxX3I61y1EVl/chFl grYP2oqUg0o7iblWvUkM/E/7fN5j93AP0EeD2MjWlK7/7LFV2TxxIwM2Sg5bWo66Danl s7CQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QimCOkYQOWLC8k7kZvsFVUmfIuQyGrz78HkfnRYS240=; b=kgHcXAUVbc5lSBRau1Czu4iTm027aJK8mDunYCF3BE/nwQ87juRaWX+WdiLH+ObWA7 CmdpMzrwjyxFQhAal/1bCcfqKNkt5arp23o5DdsprbqaTzniO0yJQt9Ak/MJUrKNZBjv mYtSGrJIvCHhid3xcmcAmbF95VygJASmOr6Mc+285s9i6IMREqLCq6kTl9QfyKf9c8G4 Dyo11Ds/0eB3OE1/p6SUBN5XUpSmD5Zv+aJNmjLQJWD6hyP7duV3NJJqZV5jdh6hJAYC Eo6Ug8fo3Hc1b4hFWrCP1bNHvu1U5X99yBZTzKegBCcoAv2mN0QHjofZTZnlh4QbO12Z YeUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVFiY4AajPpfqQIwNxd7/kBhCR0AhK51qGYbcu698EGUHHZzu1r d7YzE8SXExsrtg9XR/2ed5GT8T5FNfTN7O0fVRM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwa1ocD4ScIEojWBZWv8QxaEMPnY0MOuuQbkgFtGNNduCjALPMY2+twPGn20viQvbSZiOP/pg+0GZy4LBLTmv0=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8f83:: with SMTP id l3mr14686856iol.73.1570811496366; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9CC87E00-FFFD-44C1-ABD8-ED69C07F4561@ietf.org> <CABcZeBPLDyRLdQOxKftw5ti7=PT_LMjcwEOXUoL5Y4-Jz56HVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPLDyRLdQOxKftw5ti7=PT_LMjcwEOXUoL5Y4-Jz56HVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 23:31:24 +0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sz0G_EqF5OD8CQAOipgT4HUAgU6_37SDZBhqeYeCY25Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sergeant-at-arms engagement model
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: IETF Sergeant-at-Arms <saa@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000040084a0594a50da3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5Ll7aIXlOlOHjrwXRnVEIwjdPRE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:31:39 -0000

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:54 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

>
> I see that there are a bunch of open issues in the "Unprofessional
> Commentary" definition. Can you say more about how you plan to evolve that?
>

Yeah, the Github page contains a circular definition (one instance
of "Unprofessional Commentary" is "Unprofessional Commentary"...)

What are the boundaries around raising issues that are sure to offend some
set of people? For example, the IETF's use of Github might be objectionable
to some:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-10/microsoft-employees-call-to-end-github-ice-contract

I think the rules are pretty clear when someone is spamming / swearing /
etc.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email