IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 17 December 2015 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163511A1AD3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:10:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BhFKAzremrcS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:10:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0C6E1B2F14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:10:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-x230.google.com with SMTP id cs9so47837286lbb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:10:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=M+qO2K6gSce0g3niNqaKfS9j344qsBoRzu2T3gbwsQ4=; b=M4NFiISTlYMCihJA6A47FnIl78QblFgP1SORDZSvBGMAa5JvUrsKhtkp9iD7sM5A70 QbWhb95nVfEkLViBPDXOSrgapLJWmdVTruKbMQGSeUR8kYpMNkrPdsi18RXASjw8sU9q 5hCR+bCihSiQXxkayJUSsIZ0l4JqtYftNohWNgDIUC0StVVyrVLNBhHDpsmPRmSETKmm UGfGPl4D22UQ5paWY0lgrY6o6vho5/bLh6fYZFeNEfCoYfyIxMXSAUzqXzKnOzmjMzlq 6ahln4O0qcCmqNTuAEOaTupgM4flHmJvPRRJNft8WKxg66iLpY8FfQigz5W5ehUg1NWz 8E8Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.184.45 with SMTP id er13mr21789113lbc.133.1450368639939; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.1.227 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:10:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3BF223AD6736F4F0D0AD2FB5@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
References: <723B626B-97C8-475A-BED1-EAB64C7E146F@standardstrack.com> <5671819D.4040303@tzi.org> <389D8D8B-C113-4F9F-96BB-B4E9E63B1691@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|21e6d02d918fb96ab4b441900d4c683brBFFUG03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|389D8D8B-C113-4F9F-96BB-B4E9E63B1691@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <20151216160539.GA20112@cisco.com> <1FFA9F32-DE51-41CB-8EF1-DAD80DD508DD@salsgiver.com> <20151216161409.GB20112@cisco.com> <B709E690-321B-4119-A7C9-CF814A5E59F6@salsgiver.com> <20151216162031.GC20112@cisco.com> <567190A6.1030804@alcatel-lucent.com> <20151216163928.GA22068@cisco.com> <E47B41DA-5DED-41EF-8461-B1A0EC4F6E19@isoc.org> <3BF223AD6736F4F0D0AD2FB5@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:10:39 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: HVTiBQWlZGCdtZpkbfmI2_Pt0Zo
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwheckjue1pCxaRLwUNVjf1sg1r3PSQ4Lo09UvstH-giOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5Ybh-eQ-vfvupq6s7ZqPnDmnf1c>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:10:43 -0000

First meeting for IAB/IESG members during IETF week is 8am, possibly earlier.

My first meeting I have to be at is 9am on some days of the week.

Sure, I might arrange a breakfast meeting etc. But there is a big
difference between a meeting I arrange at my convenience where I
expect four or five people to be at and one that is set by others and
will have two dozen people discussing something that is complex and
not necessarily my stuff.

I am all for greater openness and accountability in IETF. But the
starting point for that would be recognizing that we do actually have
a membership and officeholders should be accountable to it rather than
petty attempts to strip officeholders of the only perk they get for
doing the jobs.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status