Re: SDN and Routing Protocols
Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Wed, 16 April 2014 18:10 UTC
Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832EC1A02B4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgMNuy9v5fvJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x231.google.com (mail-oa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2D91A01AC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id o6so12794827oag.36 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ERe2Qla1ANW2OASCXE/AW1GHP9pprMnY55768Xb/xx8=; b=v4Xb1gWYgqL4/vF8UEVaXg1jswGL4uMQ3HZlJ3lzUWsrKX19e2yNtzxr/Dj1XiIppT 68em+bakt+An1VMjwUubiaiZL7l1twUlJsvPVJSbuNJBE2SnajwW9sfVWEhy3gYo0LiO hQ6LOO74ljj/mA5B+J+x32hbIE1jA8TskZ6f9zpXrPdTuvsdSnmDct6OKTNXg6PsxC0X 4XArK+Rt3NRDtFyVSP/AtiRCK5XaGNdnNR6PSxBu12B1o+rToWj6AeHIoyc0OdAtIdNC zGXsFZBgLe1rbkhy4tp6YElgMFUjehzjnMGAoWS0n16DOLa3W8fz24aZ+a8CrpmXjtFL mYTw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.153.226 with SMTP id vj2mr7907639obb.26.1397671821903; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.153.6 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.153.6 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADDmorQ+ML8oOdkG5OJ4uQj8ufC6K15c4ieXgz=5RtSXPQJZZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADDmorQ+ML8oOdkG5OJ4uQj8ufC6K15c4ieXgz=5RtSXPQJZZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:10:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP9nYR=u=MFhup_xWt_GFSQp6rFBwsUV_yWjjwytkWTr-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SDN and Routing Protocols
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
To: Abhishek Verma <abhishekv.verma@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013d0dc0750eee04f72cd454"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/5c6EI9a-GDzj12XDjXLibLIvWmc
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:10:26 -0000
No one answered this? On Apr 12, 2014 4:20 AM, "Abhishek Verma" <abhishekv.verma@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is SDN going to make routing protocols less relevant? No. SDN is appropriate in some environments but not all. > as i understand more and more of this technology, there seems to be a clear trend towards OSPF/ISIS less environments. Yes but we were already doing this, e.g. with MPLS, before SDN took off. > Obviously, BGP is still needed if youre talking across AS boundaries. Yes but inter-domain SDN is also reasonable. swb
- SDN and Routing Protocols Abhishek Verma
- Re: SDN and Routing Protocols Scott Brim