IETF Logo Mail Archive

Discussing Draft Netiquette

"JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com> Sat, 05 March 2005 13:27 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA13381; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:27:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D7ZLL-0002Hn-CJ; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:29:19 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D7ZF6-0006nu-Un; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:22:52 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D7ZF5-0006np-6p for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:22:51 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA13104 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:22:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [63.247.76.195] (helo=montage.altserver.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D7ZGq-0002C4-LB for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:24:41 -0500
Received: from lns-p19-19-idf-82-249-7-203.adsl.proxad.net ([82.249.7.203] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1D7ZEr-0001ad-4i for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 05:22:37 -0800
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050305140700.0529cc60@mail.jefsey.com>
X-Sender: jefsey+jefsey.com@mail.jefsey.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:22:30 +0100
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <748F18B30D828F71B6EF06D3@scan.jck.com>
References: <E1D471Y-00040l-00@mx20.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <D686083A628844EED9C19A19@scan.jck.com> <01LLI6WN3H8O00005R@mauve.mrochek.com> <200503042335.38093.blilly@erols.com> <748F18B30D828F71B6EF06D3@scan.jck.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Subject: Discussing Draft Netiquette
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab

Would there be an objection that netiquette calls to quote the Draft's URL 
when discussing a Draft, as when quoting and discussing any other document? 
The time wasted in finding discussed Drafts (and actually discussed 
version) probably make interest in them to drop and comments to be lost or 
never proposed.

Last Call: 'Message Submission' to Draft Standard  ...
Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-assumptions-02.txt
'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At ...

are among the last drafts I would have been interested to review after some 
of the coments. If one cannot easily compare a comment with the proposed 
text, what is the interest of the text and of the comment?
jfc




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email