Requirement to go to meetings (was: Re: Anotherj RFP without IETF community input)

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sun, 23 October 2011 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591E321F8AF4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMVp1W0H-uK8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F0921F8A6F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (host-92-27-130-239.static.as13285.net [92.27.130.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9N8bfIw009903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:37:49 -0700
Message-ID: <4EA3B39B.8000709@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 07:26:35 +0100
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Subject: Requirement to go to meetings (was: Re: Anotherj RFP without IETF community input)
References: <20111019162557.9196B21F88A0@ietfa.amsl.com> <B20DB1F6016850BA9AB6F2ED@PST.JCK.COM> <m24nz3pqy5.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAMm+Lwhnu5WfQs-PBPtQzkNcrbPVs8CKV_gF+f+Tmf3kN-1Kpg@mail.gmail.com> <140293C1-E2F8-4193-BF96-519144149874@ericsson.com> <4EA1C0D9.5010501@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EA1C0D9.5010501@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 08:37:56 -0000

On 10/21/2011 7:58 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
>  It's increasingly the case that if you
> want to do work at the IETF, you need to go to meetings. I'd have
> considerable reservations about asking for the kind of money you're
> suggesting.


Melinda,

I've changed the subject line because the point you raise is orthogonal to the 
main thread, but since you raise it, it's worth exploring a bit (since I happen 
to agree with your observation.)

The dynamics that make this true seem to have to do with changes in our 
community rather than in the nature of the technical work or the online tools.

So the question is how to move the center of gravity back to mailing lists?

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net