Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync URI Scheme) to Informational RFC
Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com> Thu, 01 October 2009 23:06 UTC
Return-Path: <weiler@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63493A6781 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.968
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.968 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.631, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fpSQJmCM4o8T for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DB93A67A7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id n91N83oI027082; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:08:03 -0500
Received: from mailbin2.ads.sparta.com (mailbin.sparta.com [157.185.85.6]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n91N837i008654; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:08:03 -0500
Received: from localhost ([204.152.186.186]) by mailbin2.ads.sparta.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:08:03 -0400
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:08:01 -0400
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
X-X-Sender: weiler@little
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync URI Scheme) to Informational RFC
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0910011901430.23408@little>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2009 23:08:03.0510 (UTC) FILETIME=[07441D60:01CA42EC]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:13:02 -0700
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:06:40 -0000
> I think the point is that the IESG should probably refer the doc to > the uri-review team to look for any red flags. Mistakes in URI > specs are common (speaking has one that has made some). The editors asked the uri-review list for feedback in July of this year, as required by RFC 4395. -- Sam
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync … Ted Hardie
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync … Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync … Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync … Ted Hardie
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync … Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: draft-weiler-rsync-uri (The rsync … Samuel Weiler