Re: last message

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 16 March 2020 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FC03A2320 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 04:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BohufMAbfDlU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 04:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEAA3A231D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 04:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.203.153]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 02GBXJHF009980 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 04:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1584358417; x=1584444817; i=@elandsys.com; bh=fCsmSo337lyy/P/V+EHgGjs233MyTMT639h0170mV+o=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=0GA/mtwMD2rID6CNr9+xC7MvI/R/ZokOw2emEQcBCGX4T3wf4VJCR4TKxprNo7kAe aoU3qZ8VUtdkVbseW7zkePakANXgkx9AiHQ2GV/8CZQRCLSBeEc3Ku+eruWcpGgUE3 pBvGC96z29QGX6lqft3RkFnaAo3XMaVrfWncJMF8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200316031757.12448b80@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 04:26:03 -0700
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: last message
In-Reply-To: <3a6160d9-987d-2a5b-1bba-9781578a875c@gmail.com>
References: <3a6160d9-987d-2a5b-1bba-9781578a875c@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7t1s00CJCwPbVfyyvPdUX_-byFA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:33:47 -0000

Hi Alex,
At 02:49 AM 16-03-2020, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>I received a few requests in private to clarify.

I read your messages to the mailing list.  In my 
opinion, you were expressing a concern 
(inquiétude).  It is related to the recent 
crisis.  There is probably a little more to it.

Some of the messages might be off-topic if there 
is a strict reading of the relevant rules.  That 
is likely how things are done in authoritarian 
regimes.  Would that be the decent thing to do 
here?  Well, it is not for me to decide.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy