IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF posting delays

Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl> Mon, 07 May 2012 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC3E21F84EF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 01:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pASe0IirlX4b for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 01:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bartok.nlnetlabs.nl (bartok.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1:216:76ff:feb8:3c02]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380CF21F84AA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NLnetLabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bartok.nlnetlabs.nl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q478P38h050921; Mon, 7 May 2012 10:25:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 bartok.nlnetlabs.nl q478P38h050921
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=sleutel; t=1336379105; bh=cQ5k6WuYHHc1aMMPr2w6AzbJmzL2cXeKytnWKr2KAW4=; h=To:cc:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=mlXVniCvvSIWMRCQxpXMFAX/C8sa16YS+WCaJXs2YkNYF5clfLkfjixMxeRtfeAJS RUtmpt7ARghnaJkxEPBfjB0F0Yypq8jP9OqJhPCH0cr3fF8EXIHb16MqcZOez8C84V 1hZ010ipsqMFKPSVqh01SI4uzvFMLVTxawNX5g78=
Message-Id: <201205070825.q478P38h050921@bartok.nlnetlabs.nl>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: IETF posting delays
In-reply-to: <m2y5p4aht3.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <4FA5AC1F.4010005@gmail.com> <m2vckac9rq.wl%randy@psg.com> <4FA60919.9000403@gmail.com> <F9304BA3-C842-42B3-97BF-F3B2B725AD9C@cisco.com> <4FA716D6.2050402@santronics.com> <m2y5p4aht3.wl%randy@psg.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> message dated "Sun, 06 May 2012 15:41:44 -1000."
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 10:25:03 +0200
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bartok.nlnetlabs.nl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 07 May 2012 10:25:04 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Hector Santos <hsantos@santronics.com>, IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 08:25:09 -0000

    indeed, the following line in your header was the clue.
    X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:10:17 -0700

That is interesting, I didn't had this line in the header. Strange.

	jaap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email