Re: Last Call: SDP attribute for qualifying Media Formats with Generic Parameters to a Proposed Standard

ned.freed@mrochek.com Fri, 20 June 2003 15:06 UTC

Received: from asgard.ietf.org (asgard.ietf.org [10.27.6.40]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA11293 for <ietf-web-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 11:06:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordomo by asgard.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.14) id 19TNNh-0007iX-0S for ietf-list@asgard.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 11:00:49 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([10.27.2.28]) by asgard.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19TNLM-000795-Hz for ietf@asgard.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:58:24 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA10807; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:58:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: ned.freed@mrochek.com
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19TNLL-00058M-00; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:58:23 -0400
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com ([209.55.107.55]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19TNLK-00058F-00; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:58:23 -0400
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01KX9YXV5TSW00CUGD@mauve.mrochek.com>; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:44:09 -0700
Subject: Re: Last Call: SDP attribute for qualifying Media Formats with Generic Parameters to a Proposed Standard
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:22:22 -0400" <E19T4zG-00044l-CY@asgard.ietf.org>
To: iesg@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Message-id: <01KXB6JAPVBE00CUGD@mauve.mrochek.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <E19T4zG-00044l-CY@asgard.ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> The IESG has received a request from Individual Submissions WG to consider
> the following Internet-Draft(s) as a Proposed Standard. This has been
> reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF Working Group.
> o Individual Submissions (NONE): SDP attribute for qualifying Media
>   Formats with Generic Parameters
>     <draft-rajeshkumar-mmusic-gpmd-03.txt>
>     Proposed Standard

This looks to me like a substantive duplication of the media features facility
defined in RFC 2533 and elaborated on in RFCs 2506, 2530, 2534, 2738, 2912,
2913, 2938, and 2987. Not only does this set of documents provide a
full-featured media feature tagging and content negotiation facility, the
relationship to MIME media types and parameters has also been worked out.

Although the media features facility defined in these various RFCs is perhaps
too elaborate for SDP's needs, it should at least be possible to reuse the
basic descriptive elements of media features and the corresponding media
features registry.

At a minimum this draft needs to explain why the existing media features
facility is unsuitable for SDP's use and another, similar facility needs to
be defined.

				Ned