Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04
Stewart Bryant <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk> Thu, 23 February 2017 11:46 UTC
Return-Path: <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A14412A16C; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:46:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart@g3ysx.org.uk>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.45.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148785040242.20313.16585453406395577753.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 03:46:42 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9ov8fuZT-zV_BC_6rVu9nHL4lmg>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:46:42 -0000
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-?? Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2017-02-23 IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-20 IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-02 Summary: Thus is ready for publication. There are two minor nits, but these can be delegated to the RFC Editor. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: Should say Obsoletes: RFC5987 (if approved) ("RFC" missing) Extended notation, using the Unicode characters U+00A3 ("£", POUND SIGN) and U+20AC ("€", EURO SIGN): My European computer can display £ and €, but not sure if all can or whether the RFC series supports these symbols. There symbols were not present in RFC5987, they were just named. FYI Nits complains about obsoleting RFC2231 can be ignored The nits complaint about RFC2616 can be ignored The nits complaint about RFC2978 cab be ignored
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04 Julian Reschke
- Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04 Stewart Bryant