Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Thu, 25 May 2006 15:19 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjHcK-0006eR-7d; Thu, 25 May 2006 11:19:16 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjHcI-0006eJ-5y for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 11:19:14 -0400
Received: from ns.jck.com ([209.187.148.211] helo=bs.jck.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjHcG-0001zD-RY for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 25 May 2006 11:19:14 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=p3.JCK.COM) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FjHcE-000PLA-KG; Thu, 25 May 2006 11:19:10 -0400
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:19:09 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
Message-ID: <EA19E8AF6558ABCDE812C93B@p3.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <44756E72.4020200@alvestrand.no>
References: <200605241856.LAA14721@gra.isi.edu> <44756E72.4020200@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.4 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

(several  lists deleted)

--On Thursday, 25 May, 2006 10:44 +0200 Harald Alvestrand
<harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> The Last Call on draft-rfc-editor-author-lists was issued on
> May 20, 2002, and the IESG approved that document on August
> 27, 2002, according to the tracker:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=vie
> w_id&dTag=8778&rfc_flag=0
> 
> On Jan 3, 2005, it was marked "dead" based on the fact that
> the text had been incorporated into the 2223bis draft.
> So it's been almost 4 years since IETF consensus was declared
> for this policy.

Since, as I understand it, completion and publication of 2223bis
has been put on indefinite hold, is it time to dust off
draft-rfc-editor-author-lists and publish it?

Also, since we have a last call on the IPOD/ION draft in effect,
could you, Harald, walk us quickly through how you would see
this situation being untangled, or handled in a more clear way,
were the ION series in effect?  Would the content of
draft-rfc-editor-author-lists fall into that series?  Would
2223bis?

     john


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf