Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> Tue, 03 November 2015 10:14 UTC
Return-Path: <azet@azet.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D2E1B3179 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 02:14:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id knVqIUboJ0Ig for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 02:13:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A68851B317A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 02:13:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmeg8 with SMTP id g8so80213579wme.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 02:13:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=azet.org; s=gmail; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6acGhnyQT0stsrPsCQW0zfSKPnoPz9eqIBlOvZ2jzzI=; b=CfML0irxwR85+XE0KdQi75OqcGyFstMt1/6+S6SMfjzaP5FUK9bT1+zHIw2IYwEUEl JFnPhm8VWURwRejQsqUC1Jw7ppTV4fLuw8ikPDwgLtdA0F5aHynES/AR2dgDUzX3FX8+ HrLbai79xL1lojvGe/e3BFeGrL88AwjH4OeTU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=6acGhnyQT0stsrPsCQW0zfSKPnoPz9eqIBlOvZ2jzzI=; b=SAx4mmFYtgtkIiSAaXU/nQkeuE4tO2u3TuLXa6wCBluVlicjCDnYsOtfO2k8Fpltd1 6Ki7oaLEyw+ofP8VGl8b5DG9abJOyFw9aNfzsQi6JFTRQwGfIm7rSNZFgquwFD/5MkNb AC5duSeURgSDV5kByRgVtxdyLpU5OIPgdyprUMgJU1D7u07SJUWsh0gDlmYALdGF9ZYC mQqt4aRz56Q0VqNeHhCdhPrmh7VerV5ArgSEknsI3q6Cxl1l6PL/5QUtJwGEWblkxG8b qHyp1pC8SJmejp+Pg9pfkkBJif8bs3XObBAYpN0k25RKBimp2kntt8Wed43I+fsK4OZ4 sYLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/wF2KiVTX2C6IwezKkfydZtVx7FUX2GL9sc2B8xVYkYomLAmaB1z/saDoBvbzL4g42fvO
X-Received: by 10.28.170.18 with SMTP id t18mr19531349wme.73.1446545637236; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 02:13:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from typhoon.azet.org (chello080108049181.14.11.vie.surfer.at. [80.108.49.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y77sm22495421wme.15.2015.11.03.02.13.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Nov 2015 02:13:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:13:52 +0100
From: Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org>
To: uta@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements
Message-ID: <20151103111305.e6ab89ada0@1a311c040f768cf>
References: <55B62F80.1010400@azet.org> <20151030115708.80a5221a87@43412e1d2c718c7> <20151031050630.GB24882@mournblade.imrryr.org> <1F1B4718D570C1E3AD9AFADB@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <20151031150922.GP18315@mournblade.imrryr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151031150922.GP18315@mournblade.imrryr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Aox2OVGdyDqDUs8CR19z3dQJ2cg>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:14:00 -0000
Hi, FYI, there's now a third paper dealing with TLS in communication protocols: http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.00341 Aaron
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Viktor Dukhovni
- E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Aaron Zauner
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Aaron Zauner
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Michael Richardson
- RE: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Salz, Rich
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Aaron Zauner
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Carsten Bormann
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Hector Santos
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Aaron Zauner
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Michael Richardson
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Aaron Zauner
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Tony Finch
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements John C Klensin
- it's not end-to-end *versus* hop-by-hop for email… Stephen Farrell
- Re: it's not end-to-end *versus* hop-by-hop for e… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Aaron Zauner
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Aaron Zauner
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements John C Klensin
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Watson Ladd
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Aaron Zauner
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Simon Josefsson
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements John C Klensin