Re: [OPS-DIR] Partial review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04

"jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 21 February 2017 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AE11296F8; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:08:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nzcF9AoQw5AI; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:08:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x242.google.com (mail-pg0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872BD1296F7; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:08:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x242.google.com with SMTP id z128so1042585pgb.3; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:08:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tdWulHAfzBxZijNyoX/pCDe/5ROZNtg9UGVcQx1YEMw=; b=At13GJUMWF/ouvQQk03dCK4kEjesTz32It2Cgr+H7EbI8FGj+LR9EhLSYwdjG2PWaf L9okUoOpUQwxGWf5ZicDf3SBChUIEO+jOU8HDee0u3LwiFB804p9eUlxy/iib5Glh0k5 9wHxQFhMFesSuIsSyYQJ7KLDQ0JQIrX4gUBe4n+fSn0aBm6agbhfN8ejP5HsB72WV74M 3uqX6i9S2etJW4EtXoHmknVxjumugs6F3nBvbIpoTdWH8++l3tDSbjEJ4hnB7vpdKo98 y5doyp4bp64/+Mt3Eu78F8DOp3jhd+BnC9IQNPFFMZoXy5BsisYq7mrDFJtuF4C7ZG6+ c65g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tdWulHAfzBxZijNyoX/pCDe/5ROZNtg9UGVcQx1YEMw=; b=qWNYgRBnvqdcV3JKvyr3p9+a/Z5mpcSzWCJdO0OfSN6Grk8D7UIdjJAwEhfjoryyQp kq5GfPgfYiEMIo4csb7noBDn36d5rVMXRhz4K15ApxSlZ5Ti3ordypMB2y01HV/fLn3b dDD+TmQGVRwNJEH0McmAozGK0fDYTcaKZKcmi9E0kR2/YXtuey2gMqCkVJKSDNGQxOt2 unL7Xh0kfRI66v/5/I5LZdV03pGQvpOQuE4hIpnsQT5wsAA0IeEwvwo5PSAiwE04UZ/F u+5+ZUPt4yJ1fdvC/bA9i26pAP5Znnwof4dM1CI4Zj9GmcKol8DT4Dk3RbKqnpZhADe/ g4jw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kq9c6Hu48EsmTw1wATAwZTE68Swqxs85wd1T28mb8hqPvbm5b1OKF2QyVBRyjrEA==
X-Received: by 10.84.232.129 with SMTP id i1mr42374585plk.129.1487707710069; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:08:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.89.94] ([216.31.219.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l3sm42845337pgn.10.2017.02.21.12.08.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:08:28 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: [OPS-DIR] Partial review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04
From: "jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b08d4591-437c-f65f-8a51-c4f807261c7e@greenbytes.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:08:27 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <14AF10FC-7B86-4838-9EF6-19F02446D8C1@gmail.com>
References: <148770448855.19178.9845548060581119883.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <b08d4591-437c-f65f-8a51-c4f807261c7e@greenbytes.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BLr4S2hNTS0H87G8ctUlUFUS7NA>
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Jouni Korhonen <jounikor@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis.all@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:08:32 -0000

> On Feb 21, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2017-02-21 20:14, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>> ...
>> The IDnits complains about non-ascii characters (pound, euro, etc). I
>> am not sure whether that will turn out to an "editorial" issue in the
>> final RFC text.
>> ...
> 
> Right. That's because the tool chain doesn't yet support that properly. That shouldn’t stop us from pushing.

Yep. That should not be any kind of blocking factor/issue.

> (I’m ok with the spec spending some quality time in the RFC Editor queue until they are ready)

Whatever works for you/Editor.

- Jouni

> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-DIR mailing list
> OPS-DIR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-dir