IETF Logo Mail Archive

Experimental track (was: Non-participants)

"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Thu, 01 November 2007 10:52 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InXfU-0001Hz-Cv; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:52:56 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InXfT-0001Ht-Hd for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:52:55 -0400
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InXfT-0003W2-4t for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:52:55 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1InXfK-0005tf-0W for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:52:46 +0000
Received: from mail.st-michaelis.de ([217.86.170.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:52:46 +0000
Received: from nobody by mail.st-michaelis.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:52:46 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:49:48 +0100
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <fgcb5p$2q1$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0710270735240.13665-100000@egate.xpasc.com><BE07EB04-38C6-4465-B770-EBA05354FB9B@hxr.us><472388E9.8070700@gmail.com><6D007A8C-B397-458E-A9BD-F50F069ED73F@hxr.us><01MN4YDVFDI400BDC1@mauve.mrochek.com> <shodeebgjx.fsf@lnxcu9.lns.cornell.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.st-michaelis.de
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Subject: Experimental track (was: Non-participants)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Dan Riley wrote:
 
> there is some evidence that people presumably well versed in
> IETF process and RFC2026 terminology can be sloppy in its 
> application--from
 
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg04120.html
[...]
>| The IESG solicits final comments on whether the IETF community
>| has consensus to publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as an
>| _experimental standard_ given the IPR claimed.
 
> (_emphasis_ added)

Brilliant.  While they were at it they also sanctioned a new 
"experimental track".  IANA will be thrilled when I ask them
to implement "experimental standard" RFC 2345 because it's 
on "experimental track" suited for the IDN TLD experiment.

 Frank
-- 
http://www.google.com/search?cx=001904119753490578822:zvsejdqm-pw&cof=FORID:0;AH:center&q=%22experimental+track%22


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email